Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25512837›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ethics and history of medicine2014

Nurses' perspectives on breaking bad news to patients and their families: a qualitative content analysis.

Abbas Abbaszadeh, Seyyedeh Roghayeh Ehsani, Jamal Begjani, Mohammad Akbari Kaji, Fatemeh Nemati Dopolani, Amir Nejati, Esmaeil Mohammadnejad

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Design and Validation of a Questionnaire on Communicating Bad News in Nursing: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abbas AbbaszadehProfessor, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyyedeh Roghayeh EhsaniDepartment of Nursing, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jamal BegjaniPhD candidate in Nursing, Department of Nursing Education, Islamic Azad University, Iranshahr Branch, Iranshahr, Iran.
Mohammad Akbari KajiPhD candidate in Nursing, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, and Young Researchers Club, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khoorasgan), Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh Nemati DopolaniDepartment of Nursing, Petruleum Hospital, Mahshar, Iran.
Amir NejatiAssistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Esmaeil MohammadnejadPhD candidate in Nursing, International Branch, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Imam Khomeini Hospital · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breaking bad news is quite often not done in an effective manner in clinical settings due to the medical staff lacking the skills necessary for speaking to patients and their families. Bad news is faced with similar reactions on the part of the news receiver in all cultures and nations. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of Iranian nurses on breaking bad news to patients and their families. In this research, a qualitative approach was adopted. In-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 nurses who had at least one year work experience in the ward, and content analysis was performed to analyze the data. Five major categories emerged from data analysis, including effective communication with patients and their families, preparing the ground for delivering bad news, minimizing the negativity associated with the disease, passing the duty to physicians, and helping patients and their families make logical treatment decisions. The results of this study show that according to the participants, it is the physicians' duty to give bad news, but nurses play an important role in delivering bad news to patients and their companions and should therefore be trained in clinical and communicative skills to be able to give bad news in an appropriate and effective manner.

Indexed as

bad newsnurses patients relationshipqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID25512837
PMCPMC4263382
OpenAlexW2181929021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.