Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25512823›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ethics and history of medicine2014

End-of-life care ethical decision-making: Shiite scholars' views.

Mina Mobasher, Kiarash Aramesh, Farzaneh Zahedi, Nouzar Nakhaee, Mamak Tahmasebi, Bagher Larijani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Caregivers' Knowledge of and Attitude towards Palliative Care in Iran.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. General approaches to ethical reasoning in Islamic biomedical ethics discourse.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mina MobasherMedical Ethics PhD Candidates, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, and Medical Ethics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kiarash ArameshAssociate Professor, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzaneh ZahediMD, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, and Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Centre,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nouzar NakhaeeProfessor, Neuroscience Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mamak TahmasebiAssistant Professor, Palliative Care Department, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bagher LarijaniProfessor, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, and Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Centre,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in life-sustaining treatments and technologies, have given rise to newly-emerged, critical and sometimes, controversial questions regarding different aspects of end-of-life decision-making and care. Since religious values are among the most influential factors in these decisions, the present study aimed to examine the Islamic scholars' views on end-of-life care. A structured interview based on six main questions on ethical decision-making in end-of-life care was conducted with eight Shiite experts in Islamic studies, and was analyzed through deductive content analysis. Analysis revealed certain points in Islamic views on the definition of death and the persons making decisions about end-of-life care. According to the participants, in addition to conventional criteria ('urf) such as absence of heartbeat and respiration, the irreversible cessation of human voluntary acts (as a sign that the soul has control over the body and the faculty of thinking) are considered to be the criteria in establishing death. The participants also recognized physicians as the main authorities in verifying signs of death. Furthermore, it was emphasized that life preservation and continuation of care must be sensible, and the patient can request not to have death-prolonging procedures started or continued. In the view of participants, patient's autonomy cannot be the sole basis for all measures, but Islamic ethical and jurisprudential principles should be relied upon to make correct and sensible decisions whether to continue or stop terminal patients' care. Final decisions should be made by a team of experts, and physicians must be at the center of such a team. Finally, we suggest that a guideline in keeping with Islamic norms on human life and death, purpose of life, God's will, boundaries of man's authority, and the physician's ethical duties and obligations should be developed.

Indexed as

deathIslamic viewslifesecular viewsterminal patient

Identifiers

PMID25512823
PMCPMC4263386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.