Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25512681›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2014

Anti-fungal resistance in candida isolated from oral and diaper rash candidiasis in neonates.

Jasem Mohamadi, Mahsa Motaghi, Jafar Panahi, Mohamad Reza Havasian, Ali Delpisheh, Mitra Azizian, Iraj Pakzad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Susceptibility pattern ofCurrent medical mycology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current medical mycology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jasem MohamadiDepartment pediaterics, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam/ Iran.
Mahsa MotaghiDepartment Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam/ Iran.
Jafar PanahiStudent research of committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam/ Iran.
Mohamad Reza HavasianStudent research of committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam/ Iran.
Ali DelpishehDepartment Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam/ Iran.
Mitra AzizianDepartment Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam/ Iran.
Iraj PakzadDepartment Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam/ Iran ; Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam/ Iran.
Medical University of Ilam · IRIlam University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the sensitivity of Candida species isolated from oral candidiasis and diaper dermatitis infections in children. The children referring to private and public clinics in Ilam, Iran were exmined for oral candidiasis and diaper dermatitis. In this study, 248 oral candidiasis and diaper dermatitis samples were collected and cultured.Candida species were identified by using standard methods. Resistance and sensitivity to amphotericin B, nystatin, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, clotrimazole, and posaconazole were determined using the CLSI M44-A standard disk diffusion method. From the 248 studied samples, 149 were positive for Candida, among which the Candida albicans was the most prevalent (64.4%). The resistance of different Candida species to nystatin, itraconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, clotrimazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole were 4, 43, 34.2, 34.9, 21.5, 6, and 6.7%, respectively. No resistance to amphotericin B was observed. Considering rather low resistance to nystatin, this drug is the best choice for oral candidiasis and diaper dermatitis.

Indexed as

Diaper dermatitisDrug resistanceOral candidiasis

Identifiers

PMID25512681
PMCPMC4261109
OpenAlexW1971877800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.