Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25512538›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Economic optimization of a global strategy to address the pandemic threat.

Jamison Pike, Tiffany Bogich, Sarah Elwood, David C Finnoff, Peter Daszak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pathogens and planetary change.Nature reviews. Biodiversity · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pandemic origins and a One Health approach to preparedness and prevention: Solutions based on SARS-CoV-2 and other RNA viruses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Review
  17. Leveraging the therapeutic, biological, and self-assembling potential of peptides for the treatment of viral infections.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jamison PikeDepartment of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071; EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001;
Tiffany BogichEcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001; Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Sarah ElwoodEcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001;
David C FinnoffDepartment of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071;
Peter DaszakEcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001; daszak@ecohealthalliance.org.

Funding

Modeling Anthropogenic Effects in the Spread of Infectious DiseasesR01GM100471 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PERRINGS, CHARLES · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M008894/1NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01-GM100471-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging pandemics threaten global health and economies and are increasing in frequency. Globally coordinated strategies to combat pandemics, similar to current strategies that address climate change, are largely adaptive, in that they attempt to reduce the impact of a pathogen after it has emerged. However, like climate change, mitigation strategies have been developed that include programs to reduce the underlying drivers of pandemics, particularly animal-to-human disease transmission. Here, we use real options economic modeling of current globally coordinated adaptation strategies for pandemic prevention. We show that they would be optimally implemented within 27 y to reduce the annual rise of emerging infectious disease events by 50% at an estimated one-time cost of approximately $343.7 billion. We then analyze World Bank data on multilateral "One Health" pandemic mitigation programs. We find that, because most pandemics have animal origins, mitigation is a more cost-effective policy than business-as-usual adaptation programs, saving between $344.0.7 billion and $360.3 billion over the next 100 y if implemented today. We conclude that globally coordinated pandemic prevention policies need to be enacted urgently to be optimally effective and that strategies to mitigate pandemics by reducing the impact of their underlying drivers are likely to be more effective than business as usual.

Indexed as

Disease Transmission, InfectiousModels, EconomicPandemicsCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansadaptationclimate changeemerging infectious diseasesmitigationOne Health

Identifiers

PMID25512538
PMCPMC4284561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.