Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25512535›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Detergent-free isolation, characterization, and functional reconstitution of a tetrameric K+ channel: the power of native nanodiscs.

Jonas M Dörr, Martijn C Koorengevel, Marre Schäfer, Alexander V Prokofyev, Stefan Scheidelaar, Elwin A W van der Cruijsen, Timothy R Dafforn, Marc Baldus, J Antoinette Killian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 320 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Mechanisms Governing Peptide Nanodisc Assembly and Stability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonas M DörrMembrane Biochemistry and Biophysics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; j.m.dorr@uu.nl.
Martijn C KoorengevelMembrane Biochemistry and Biophysics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands;
Marre SchäferMembrane Biochemistry and Biophysics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands;
Alexander V ProkofyevNMR Spectroscopy, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; and.
Stefan ScheidelaarMembrane Biochemistry and Biophysics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands;
Elwin A W van der CruijsenNMR Spectroscopy, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; and.
Timothy R DaffornSchool of Bio Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Marc BaldusNMR Spectroscopy, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; and.
J Antoinette KillianMembrane Biochemistry and Biophysics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands;
Utrecht University · NLUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G010412/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I020349/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J017310/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major obstacle in the study of membrane proteins is their solubilization in a stable and active conformation when using detergents. Here, we explored a detergent-free approach to isolating the tetrameric potassium channel KcsA directly from the membrane of Escherichia coli, using a styrene-maleic acid copolymer. This polymer self-inserts into membranes and is capable of extracting membrane patches in the form of nanosize discoidal proteolipid particles or "native nanodiscs." Using circular dichroism and tryptophan fluorescence spectroscopy, we show that the conformation of KcsA in native nanodiscs is very similar to that in detergent micelles, but that the thermal stability of the protein is higher in the nanodiscs. Furthermore, as a promising new application, we show that quantitative analysis of the co-isolated lipids in purified KcsA-containing nanodiscs allows determination of preferential lipid-protein interactions. Thin-layer chromatography experiments revealed an enrichment of the anionic lipids cardiolipin and phosphatidylglycerol, indicating their close proximity to the channel in biological membranes and supporting their functional relevance. Finally, we demonstrate that KcsA can be reconstituted into planar lipid bilayers directly from native nanodiscs, which enables functional characterization of the channel by electrophysiology without first depriving the protein of its native environment. Together, these findings highlight the potential of the use of native nanodiscs as a tool in the study of ion channels, and of membrane proteins in general.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCardiolipinsEscherichia coliLipid BilayersNanostructuresPhosphatidylglycerolsPotassium ChannelsRecombinant ProteinsStreptomyces lividansBacterial ProteinsCardiolipinsLipid BilayersPhosphatidylglycerolsPotassium Channelsprokaryotic potassium channelRecombinant Proteinsion channelslipid–protein interactionsmembrane–protein solubilizationnanodiscstyrene-maleic acid copolymer

Identifiers

PMID25512535
PMCPMC4284610
OpenAlexW1971067134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.