Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25512417›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Enantiospecific reassessment of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral eflornithine against late-stage Trypanosoma brucei gambiense sleeping sickness.

R Jansson-Löfmark, K Na-Bangchang, S Björkman, F Doua, M Ashton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chemotherapy for second-stage human African trypanosomiasis: drugs in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R Jansson-LöfmarkUnit for Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Department of Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden CVMD iMed DMPK, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden rasmus.jansson.lofmark@astrazeneca.com kesaratmu@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-197X
K Na-BangchangThammasat University, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Krung Thep Maha Nakhon, Thailand rasmus.jansson.lofmark@astrazeneca.com kesaratmu@yahoo.com.
S BjörkmanUppsala University, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
F DouaProject de Recherches Cliniques sue la Trypanosomiasie PRCT, B.P. Daloa, Cote d'Ivoire.
M AshtonUnit for Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Department of Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEThammasat University · THUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the stereoselective pharmacokinetics of oral eflornithine in 25 patients with late-stage Trypanosoma brucei gambiense sleeping sickness. A secondary aim was to determine the concentrations of L- and D-eflornithine required in plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for an efficient eradication of the T. brucei gambiense parasites. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 100 (group I, n=12) or 125 (group II, n=13) mg/kg of body weight of drug every 6 h for 14 days. The concentrations of L- and D-eflornithine in the plasma and CSF samples were measured using a stereospecific liquid chromatographic method. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to characterize the plasma pharmacokinetics. The plasma concentrations of L-eflornithine were on average 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51, 54%; n=321) of the D-enantiomer concentrations. The typical oral clearances of L- and D-eflornithine were 17.4 (95% CI, 15.5, 19.3) and 8.23 (95% CI, 7.36, 9.10) liters/h, respectively. These differences were likely due to stereoselective intestinal absorption. The distributions of eflornithine enantiomers to the CSF were not stereoselective. A correlation was found between the probability of cure and plasma drug exposure, although it was not more pronounced for the L-enantiomer than for that of total eflornithine. This study may explain why oral treatment for late-stage human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) patients with racemic eflornithine has previously failed; the more potent L-enantiomer is present at much lower concentrations in both plasma and CSF than those of the D-enantiomer. Eflornithine stereoselective pharmacokinetics needs to be considered if an oral dosage regimen is to be explored further.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultEflornithineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStereoisomerismTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosoma brucei gambienseTrypanosomiasis, AfricanYoung AdultEflornithineTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID25512417
PMCPMC4335853
OpenAlexW2102505595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.