ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015
Pharmacodynamic target evaluation of a novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor, SCY-078 (MK-3118), using an in vivo murine invasive candidiasis model.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-generation antifungal drugs: Mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical prospects.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Fungal lung disease.The European respiratory journal · 2024Review
- Novel antifungals and treatment approaches to tackle resistance and improve outcomes of invasive fungal disease.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- A Mini-Review of In Vitro Data forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Preclinical Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Studies and Clinical Trials in the Drug Development Process of EMA-Approved Antifungal Agents: A Review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Review
- Ibrexafungerp: A narrative overview.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for antifungal therapy optimisation in the treatment of intra-abdominal candidiasis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Invasive Fungal Infections after Liver Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Assessment of Antifungal Pharmacodynamics.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Invasive Candidiasis: Considerations for the Clinician.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Review
- Pharmacodynamics, Mechanisms of Action and Resistance, and Spectrum of Activity of New Antifungal Agents.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ibrexafungerp.Drugs in R&D · 2022Review
- Article
- Advances in anti-fungal therapies.Mycopathologia · 2021Review
- Ibrexafungerp: First Approval.Drugs · 2021Review
- Ibrexafungerp DemonstratesAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Fungal cell wall: An underexploited target for antifungal therapies.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- In Vitro Activity of Ibrexafungerp against a Collection of Clinical Isolates ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Ibrexafungerp: A First-in-Class Oral Triterpenoid Glucan Synthase Inhibitor.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A Second-Generation Fungerp Analog, SCY-247, Shows PotentAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Echinocandins inhibit the synthesis of β-1,3-D-glucan in Candida and are the first-line therapy in numerous clinical settings. Their use is limited by poor oral bioavailability, and they are available only as intravenous therapies. Derivatives of enfumafungin are novel orally bioavailable glucan synthase inhibitors. We performed an in vivo pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluation with a novel enfumafungin derivative, SCY-078 (formerly MK-3118), in a well-established neutropenic murine model of invasive candidiasis against C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. The SCY-078 MICs varied 8-fold. Oral doses of 3.125 to 200 mg/kg SCY-078 salt in sterile water produced peak levels of 0.04 to 2.66 μg/ml, elimination half-lives of 5.8 to 8.5 h, areas under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24 h) of 0.61 to 41.10 μg·h/ml, and AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) values of 0.68 to 40.31 μg·h/ml. The pharmacokinetics (PK) were approximately linear over the dose range studied. Maximum response (Emax) and PK/PD target identification studies were performed with 4 C. albicans, 4 C. glabrata, and 3 C. parapsilosis isolates. The PD index AUC/MIC was explored by using total (tAUC) and free (fAUC) drug concentrations. The maximum responses were 4.0, 4.0, and 4.3 log10 CFU/kidney reductions for C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, respectively. The AUC/MIC was a robust predictor of efficacy (R2, 0.53 to 0.91). The 24-h PD targets were a static dose of 63.5 mg/kg, a tAUC/MIC of 500, and an fAUC/MIC of 1.0 for C. albicans; a static dose of 58.4 mg/kg, a tAUC/MIC of 315, and an fAUC/MIC of 0.63 for C. glabrata; and a static dose of 84.4 mg/kg, a tAUC/MIC of 198, and an fAUC/MIC of 0.40 for C. parapsilosis. The mean fAUC/MIC values associated with a 1-log kill endpoint against these species were 1.42, 1.26, and 0.91 for C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, respectively. The static and 1-log kill endpoints were measured relative to the burden at the start of therapy. The static and 1-log kill doses, as well as the total and free drug AUC/MIC PD targets, were not statistically different between species but were numerically lower than those observed for echinocandins. SCY-078 is a promising novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor against Candida species, and further investigation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.