Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25511935›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2015

Percutaneous CT-guided cryoablation for the treatment of refractory pudendal neuralgia.

J David Prologo, Roger C Lin, Roger Williams, David Corn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Pudendal Neuralgia: A Review of the Current Literature.Current pain and headache reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Real-time probe tracking using EM-optical sensor for MRI-guided cryoablation.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J David PrologoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences Division of Interventional Radiology and Image-Guided Medicine, Emory University Hospital, 1364 Clifton Road, NE Suite D112, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA, john.david.prologo@emory.edu.
Roger C Lin
Roger Williams
David Corn
Emory University Hospital · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous CT-guided cryoablation of the pudendal nerve for the treatment of refractory pudendal neuralgia. MATERIALS AND

methodsEleven patients were selected to undergo percutaneous CT-guided cryoablation of the pudendal nerve based on established diagnostic criteria. Brief Pain Inventory questionnaires were administered prior to the procedure, during the immediate 24 h post procedure, and 45 days and 6 months following the procedure.

resultsPrior to treatment, the average level of pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) was 7.6, with pain described as "burning" (80%), "pulling" (37.5%), "crushing" (50%), "pressure" (84.5%), "throbbing" (50%), "knife-life" (52%), and "other" (60%). At 24 h, 45 days, and 6 months post-treatment, pain intensity dropped to 2.6, 3.5, and 3.1, respectively (p < 0.005). There were no procedure-related complications.

conclusionsCT-guided percutaneous cryoablation may represent a safe and efficacious option for selected patients with refractory pudendal neuralgia.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementChildChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseCryosurgeryFemaleHumansMalePudendal NeuralgiaRetrospective StudiesSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25511935
OpenAlexW2022971292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.