Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25511871›Full record

ReviewMedical microbiology and immunology2015

Therapeutic vaccines in treating chronic hepatitis B: the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end?

Marie-Louise Michel, Maryline Bourgine, Hélène Fontaine, Stanislas Pol

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Luteolin-7-Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Induced immunity against hepatitis B virus.World journal of hepatology · 2015
    Review
  9. [The advances on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: an update of 2014].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie-Louise MichelLaboratoire de Pathogenèse des virus de l'hépatite B, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France, marie-louise.michel@pasteur.fr.
Maryline Bourgine
Hélène Fontaine
Stanislas Pol

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has greatly improved over the last 20 years since it has allowed a disappearance of cirrhosis decompensation and a significant reduction of the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a complete HBV cure has not been achieved, and alternative treatments are still needed to optimize the current treatments. Therapeutic vaccination is a promising new strategy for controlling persistent infections and tumors. However, this approach has not been as successful as initially anticipated for chronic hepatitis B. General impairment of the immune responses generated during persistent HBV infection, with exhausted T cells not responding correctly to therapeutic vaccination, is most likely responsible for the poor clinical responses observed to date. We describe here the past approaches of therapeutic vaccination, in the hope that useful lessons will emerge from these previous clinical trials. Intensive research efforts are now focusing on a better understanding of immune responses in liver, on mechanisms by which HBV escapes innate immunity and on an accurate selection of the patients susceptible to benefit of immune therapy, which could increase the efficacy of therapeutic vaccination.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHepatitis B, ChronicHepatitis B VaccinesHumansImmunotherapyTreatment OutcomeHepatitis B Vaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.