ArticleBMC health services research2014
Identification of promising strategies to sustain improvements in hospital practice: a qualitative case study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Navigating the sustainability landscape: a systematic review of sustainability approaches in healthcare.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Hospital Configurations Leading to Successful Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Programs.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating for learning and sustainability (ELS) framework: a realist synthesis.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Changing practice in cystic fibrosis: Implementing objective medication adherence data at every consultation, a learning health system and quality improvement collaborative.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation in Pediatric Urology: Pilot-phase outcomes of a prospective, multi-center study.Journal of pediatric urology · 2024Article
- Views and experiences of healthcare professionals and patients on the implementation of a 23-hour accelerated enhanced recovery programme: a mixed-method study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery for major orthopedic surgery: a narrative review.Knee surgery & related research · 2022Review
- Sustaining a nursing best practice guideline in an acute care setting over 10 years: A mixed methods case study.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization Discovery of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Implementation of the VA Intensive Dysphagia Treatment Program: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.Health services insights · 2022Article
- Implementation and sustainability of an enhanced recovery pathway in pediatric bladder reconstruction: Flexibility, commitment, teamwork.Journal of pediatric urology · 2021Article
- Good compliance to enhanced recovery program improves outcome after colorectal surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2021Article
- Moving enhanced recovery after surgery from implementation to sustainability across a health system: a qualitative assessment of leadership perspectives.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery review and urology applications in 2020.BJUI compass · 2020Review
- Association of an Enhanced Recovery Pilot With Length of Stay in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.JAMA surgery · 2018Article
- Article
- Healthcare professionals' views of the enhanced recovery after surgery programme: a qualitative investigation.BMC health services research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA quality improvement collaborative is an intensive project involving a combination of implementation strategies applied in a limited "breakthrough" time window. After an implementation project, it is generally difficult to sustain its success. In the current study, sustainability was described as maintaining an implemented innovation and its benefits over a longer period of time after the implementation project has ended. The aim of the study was to explore potentially promising strategies for sustaining the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme in colonic surgery as perceived by professionals, three to six years after the hospital had successfully finished a quality improvement collaborative.
methodsA qualitative case study was performed to identify promising strategies to sustain key outcome variables related to the ERAS programme in terms of adherence, time needed for functional recovery and hospital length of stay (LOS), as achieved immediately after implementation. Ten hospitals were selected which had successfully implemented the ERAS programme in colonic surgery (2006-2009), with success defined as a median LOS of 6 days or less and protocol adherence rates above 70%. Fourteen semi-structured interviews were held with eighteen key participants of the care process three to six years after implementation, starting with the project leader in every hospital. The interviews started by confronting them with the level of sustained implementation results. A direct content analysis with an inductive coding approach was used to identify promising strategies. The mean duration of the interviews was 37 minutes (min 26 minutes - max 51 minutes).
resultsThe current study revealed strategies targeting professionals and the organisation. They comprised internal audit and feedback on outcomes, small-scale educational booster meetings, reminders, changing the physical structure of the organisation, changing the care process, making work agreements and delegating responsibility, and involving a coordinator. A multifaceted self-driven promising strategy was applied in most hospitals, and in most hospitals promising strategies were suggested to sustain the ERAS programme.
conclusionsJoining a quality improvement collaborative may not be enough to achieve long-term normalisation of transformed care, and additional investments may be needed. The findings suggest that certain post-implementation strategies are valuable in sustaining implementation successes achieved after joining a quality improvement collaborative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.