Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25511582›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2014

Identification of promising strategies to sustain improvements in hospital practice: a qualitative case study.

Stephanie M C Ament, Freek Gillissen, Albine Moser, José M C Maessen, Carmen D Dirksen, Maarten F von Meyenfeldt, Trudy van der Weijden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie M C AmentDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. stephanie.ament@mumc.nl.
Freek GillissenDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. f.gillissen@mca.nl.
Albine MoserDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. albine.moser@zuyd.nl.
José M C MaessenDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. jose.maessen@mumc.nl.
Carmen D DirksenDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. c.dirksen@mumc.nl.
Maarten F von MeyenfeldtGROW, School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. mf.vonmeyenfeldt@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Trudy van der WeijdenDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. trudy.vanderweijden@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA quality improvement collaborative is an intensive project involving a combination of implementation strategies applied in a limited "breakthrough" time window. After an implementation project, it is generally difficult to sustain its success. In the current study, sustainability was described as maintaining an implemented innovation and its benefits over a longer period of time after the implementation project has ended. The aim of the study was to explore potentially promising strategies for sustaining the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme in colonic surgery as perceived by professionals, three to six years after the hospital had successfully finished a quality improvement collaborative.

methodsA qualitative case study was performed to identify promising strategies to sustain key outcome variables related to the ERAS programme in terms of adherence, time needed for functional recovery and hospital length of stay (LOS), as achieved immediately after implementation. Ten hospitals were selected which had successfully implemented the ERAS programme in colonic surgery (2006-2009), with success defined as a median LOS of 6 days or less and protocol adherence rates above 70%. Fourteen semi-structured interviews were held with eighteen key participants of the care process three to six years after implementation, starting with the project leader in every hospital. The interviews started by confronting them with the level of sustained implementation results. A direct content analysis with an inductive coding approach was used to identify promising strategies. The mean duration of the interviews was 37 minutes (min 26 minutes - max 51 minutes).

resultsThe current study revealed strategies targeting professionals and the organisation. They comprised internal audit and feedback on outcomes, small-scale educational booster meetings, reminders, changing the physical structure of the organisation, changing the care process, making work agreements and delegating responsibility, and involving a coordinator. A multifaceted self-driven promising strategy was applied in most hospitals, and in most hospitals promising strategies were suggested to sustain the ERAS programme.

conclusionsJoining a quality improvement collaborative may not be enough to achieve long-term normalisation of transformed care, and additional investments may be needed. The findings suggest that certain post-implementation strategies are valuable in sustaining implementation successes achieved after joining a quality improvement collaborative.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementCooperative BehaviorHospitalsHumansInterviews as TopicLength of StayMedical Staff, HospitalPostoperative CareQualitative ResearchRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID25511582
PMCPMC4269857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.