Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25511321›Full record

SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2015

Predictive value of F-18 FDG PET/CT quantization parameters in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis with 702 participants.

Mixue Xie, Kefei Wu, Yan Liu, Qi Jiang, Yanhui Xie

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. BaselineDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prognostic Value ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Prognostic Values of BaselineBioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  20. Tumour necrosis as assessed withEuropean radiology · 2019
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mixue XieDepartment of Hematology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, West Yan'an Road 221#, Shanghai, 200030, China, 281515835@qq.com.
Kefei Wu
Yan Liu
Qi Jiang
Yanhui Xie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) is considered to be the most beneficial imaging method for staging patients with lymphoma. Whether maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) acquired from F-18 FDG PET/CT are predictors of prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is controversial, with some studies concluding that it is and others concluding the opposite. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to explore the relationship of F-18 FDG PET/CT quantization parameters with the prognosis of DLBCL. Seven trials with a total of 703 DLBCL patients were included for analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and odds ratios (ORs) for 3-year PFS and OS were pooled using the STATA package. Combined results suggested a strong link between the high SUVmax, MTV and TLG values and the poor 3-year PFS with ORs of 2.59, 3.69 and 2.29, respectively. Similarly, high MTV and TLG values unfavorably influenced the 3-year OS with ORs of 5.40 and 2.19, respectively. The pooled results also showed that high SUVmax and MTV were negative predictors of PFS with HRs of 1.61 (p = 0.038) and 2.18 (p = 0.000), respectively. The TLG value was not predictive of PFS. And for OS, only high MTV was a strong predictor of poor prognosis in DLBCL with HR 2.99 (p = 0.000). Our results suggested that SUVmax and MTV may be significant prognostic markers for PFS and MTV may be the only predictor for OS in DLBCL.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedDisease-Free SurvivalFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffusePredictive Value of TestsRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.