Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25511187›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2015

Advances in umbilical cord blood manipulation-from niche to bedside.

Troy C Lund, Anthony E Boitano, Colleen S Delaney, Elizabeth J Shpall, John E Wagner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells by inhibiting translation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical Advancement and Challenges ofClinical hematology international · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Troy C LundDivision of Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of Minnesota, MMC 366, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55445, USA.
Anthony E BoitanoGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, 10675 John Jay Hopkins Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Colleen S DelaneyFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, D2-100, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Elizabeth J ShpallThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit Number 423, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
John E WagnerDivision of Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of Minnesota, MMC 366, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55445, USA.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Trial Design and Biostatistical Support CoreP01CA065493 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI John E. Wagner · 1995 to 2026
$48.2M
Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells- Cord BloodR01CA061508 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI REZVANI, KATY, SHPALL, ELIZABETH J · 1993 to 2020
$5.1M
Perivascular Cell Characterization and Contribution to the Hematopoietic NicheK08HL108998 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LUND, TROY C. · 2011 to 2015
$686k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065493NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA061508NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL108998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of umbilical cord blood (UCB) as an alternative haematopoietic cell source in lieu of bone marrow for haematopoietic reconstitution is increasingly becoming a mainstay treatment for both malignant and nonmalignant diseases, as most individuals will have at least one available, suitably HLA-matched unit of blood. The principal limitation of UCB is the low and finite number of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) relative to the number found in a typical bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood allograft, which leads to prolonged engraftment times. In an attempt to overcome this obstacle, strategies that are often based on native processes occurring in the bone marrow microenvironment or 'niche' have been developed with the goal of accelerating UCB engraftment. In broad terms, the two main approaches have been either to expand UCB HSPC ex vivo before transplantation, or to modulate HSPC functionality to increase the efficiency of HSPC homing to the bone marrow niche after transplant both of which enhance the biological activities of the engrafted HSPC. Several early phase clinical trials of these approaches have reported promising results.

Indexed as

Cord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationHematopoietic Stem CellsTranslational Research, BiomedicalCell Culture TechniquesFetal BloodGraft SurvivalHumansPrognosisTransplantation, HomologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25511187
PMCPMC4430198
OpenAlexW2003878474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.