Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25511005›Full record

ReviewRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2014

[Pain assessment scales in newborns: integrative review].

Gleicia Martins de Melo, Ana Luíza Paula de Aguiar Lélis, Alline Falconieri de Moura, Maria Vera Lúcia Moreira Leitão Cardoso, Viviane Martins da Silva

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04366102 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Multisensory Stimulation and Soft Tissue Therapy on Procedural Pain and Neurodevelopment Among Preterm Neonates (MUST-P3) Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsir John SamuelRan2020 to 2023Enrolled68ConditionsNeonatal Disease, Neonatal DisorderArmsMultisensory stimulation with soft tissue therapy, Routine hospital care
NCT05253625 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Lullaby Listened to Preterm Babies in Neonatal Intensive Care Units on Physiological Parameters and Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorIzmir Tinaztepe UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled93ConditionsNeonatal Intensive Care, Music Therapy, Pain ResponsesArmsListening to a recorded lullaby.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. NEONATAL PAIN: CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PHYSIOTHERAPIST'S PERCEPTION IN THE NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gleicia Martins de MeloUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Ana Luíza Paula de Aguiar LélisUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brasil. Electronic address: aninhanurse@hotmail.com.
Alline Falconieri de MouraUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Maria Vera Lúcia Moreira Leitão CardosoUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Viviane Martins da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze studies on methods used to assess pain in newborns. DATA SOURCES: Integrative review study of articles published from 2001 to 2012, carried out in the following databases: Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and Cochrane. The sample consisted of 13 articles with level of evidence 5. DATA SYNTHESIS: 29 pain assessment scales in newborns, including 13 one-dimensional and 16 multidimensional, that assess acute and prolonged pain in preterm and full-term infants were available in scientific publications.

conclusionBased on the characteristics of scales, one cannot choose a single one as the most appropriate scale, as this choice will depend on gestational age, type of painful stimulus and the environment in which the infant is inserted. It is suggested the use of multidimensional or one-dimensional scales; however, they must be reliable and validated.

Indexed as

HumansInfant, NewbornPain MeasurementDorMedição de dorNewbornPainPain measurementRecém‐nascido

Identifiers

PMID25511005
PMCPMC4311795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.