Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25510856›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2015

The influences of CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions on the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine: exploring predictive biomarkers for treatment outcomes.

Fen Jiang, Hae-Deun Kim, Han-Sung Na, Seok-Yong Lee, Doo-Won Seo, Jong-Yeol Choi, Ji-Hye Ha, Hee-Jung Shin, Young-Hoon Kim, Myeon-Woo Chung

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pharmacokinetic correlates of venlafaxine: associated adverse reactions.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fen JiangClinical Research Division, Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Complex, Osong, Chungcheongbuk-do, 363-700, Republic of Korea.
Hae-Deun Kim
Han-Sung Na
Seok-Yong Lee
Doo-Won Seo
Jong-Yeol Choi
Ji-Hye Ha
Hee-Jung Shin
Young-Hoon Kim
Myeon-Woo Chung

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTwo biomarkers: concentration ratio of O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine and concentration sum of venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine were adopted to indicate venlafaxine responses, but neither is validated.

objectivesTo evaluate the ability of two biomarkers in reflecting venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations, and to further examine their relationship with venlafaxine treatment outcomes.

methodsTwo well-defined influencing factors: CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions were enriched into a three-period crossover study to produce venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations: In each period, healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM group; n = 12) and CYP2D6*10/*10 intermediate metabolizers (IM group; n = 12) were pretreated with clarithromycin (CYP3A4 inhibitor), or nothing (control), or clarithromycin + paroxetine (CYP3A4 + CYP2D6 inhibitors), before administration of a single-dose of 75 mg venlafaxine. Both biomarkers were evaluated (1) for their relationship with the influencing factors in healthy volunteers and (2) for their relationships with the venlafaxine responses/adverse events reported in two patient studies.

resultsSignificant venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations were observed between the EM and IM groups (geometric mean ratio [95 % CI] of area under the curve, 3.0 [1.8-5.1] in the control period), and between the control and clarithromycin + paroxetine periods (4.1 [3.5-4.7] and 2.0 [1.7-2.4] in the EM and IM group, respectively). O-Desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine was superior to venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine to reflect the influencing factors. In the patient studies, O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine > 4 showed high precision in predicting venlafaxine responders/partial-responders (92 %) and patients without venlafaxine-related adverse events (88 %); the O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine < 4 and venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine > 400 ng/ml combination showed higher precision (100 %) than O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine < 4 alone (65 %) in predicting venlafaxine non-responders.

conclusionWe propose using O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine for CYP2D6 phenotyping, and O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine with venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine for predicting venlafaxine treatment outcomes in future prospective studies.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationClarithromycinCross-Over StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Desvenlafaxine SuccinateDrug InteractionsFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansMaleMetabolic Clearance RateParoxetinePhenotypePremedicationAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationClarithromycinCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Desvenlafaxine SuccinateGenetic MarkersParoxetineVenlafaxine Hydrochloride

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.