ArticlePloS one2014
Temporal changes in population structure of a marine planktonic diatom.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond protist generalizations: different evolutionary trajectories in closely related microbial species.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Conserved genetic markers reveal widespread diatom sexual reproduction in the global ocean.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Extensive Variation in Thermal Responses and Toxin Content Among 40 Strains of the Cold-Water DiatomToxins · 2025Article
- Population bottlenecks and sexual recombination shape diatom microevolution.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Multiannual patterns of genetic structure and mating type ratios highlight the complex bloom dynamics of a marine planktonic diatom.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Phenological segregation suggests speciation by time in the planktonic diatomEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Restoration, conservation and phytoplankton hysteresis.Conservation physiology · 2021Article
- Geolocator tagging links distributions in the non-breeding season to population genetic structure in a sentinel North Pacific seabird.PloS one · 2020Article
- The anchoring effect-long-term dormancy and genetic population structure.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- Clonal expansion behind a marine diatom bloom.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- Time capsules in natural sediment archives-Tracking phytoplankton population genetic diversity and adaptation over multidecadal timescales in the face of environmental change.Evolutionary applications · 2018Review
- The role of intraspecific variation in the ecological and evolutionary success of diatoms in changing environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- Ecological dynamics and co-occurrence among marine phytoplankton, bacteria and myoviruses shows microdiversity matters.The ISME journal · 2017Article
- Exploring the impact of multidecadal environmental changes on the population genetic structure of a marine primary producer.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
- Genetic diversity affects ecological performance and stress response of marine diatom populations.The ISME journal · 2016Article
- Estimating genotypic richness and proportion of identical multi-locus genotypes in aquatic microalgal populations.Journal of plankton researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A prevailing question in phytoplankton research addresses changes of genetic diversity in the face of huge population sizes and apparently unlimited dispersal capabilities. We investigated population genetic structure of the pennate planktonic marine diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata at the LTER station MareChiara in the Gulf of Naples (Italy) over four consecutive years and explored possible changes over seasons and from year to year. A total of 525 strains were genotyped using seven microsatellite markers, for a genotypic diversity of 75.05%, comparable to that found in other Pseudo-nitzschia species. Evidence from Bayesian clustering analysis (BA) identified two genetically distinct clusters, here interpreted as populations, and several strains that could not be assigned with ≥ 90% probability to either population, here interpreted as putative hybrids. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) recovered these two clusters in distinct clouds with most of the putative hybrids located in-between. Relative proportions of the two populations and the putative hybrids remained similar within years, but changed radically between 2008 and 2009 and between 2010 and 2011, when the 2008-population apparently became the dominant one again. Strains from the two populations are inter-fertile, and so is their offspring. Inclusion of genotypes of parental strains and their offspring shows that the majority of the latter could not be assigned to any of the two parental populations. Therefore, field strains classified by BA as the putative hybrids could be biological hybrids. We hypothesize that P. multistriata population dynamics in the Gulf of Naples follows a meta-population-like model, including establishment of populations by cell inocula at the beginning of each growth season and remixing and dispersal governed by moving and mildly turbulent water masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.