Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25506827›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) spending and tobacco control efforts.

Jayani Jayawardhana, W David Bradford, Walter Jones, Paul J Nietert, Gerard Silvestri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jayani JayawardhanaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
W David BradfordDepartment of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public & International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Walter JonesHealth Administration & Policy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Paul J NietertDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Gerard SilvestriDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR029882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate whether the distributions to the states from the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) in 1998 is associated with stronger tobacco control efforts. We use state level data from 50 states and the District of Columbia from four time periods post MSA (1999, 2002, 2004, and 2006) for the analysis. Using fixed effect regression models, we estimate the relationship between MSA disbursements and a new aggregate measure of strength of state tobacco control known as the Strength of Tobacco Control (SoTC) Index. Results show an increase of $1 in the annual per capita MSA disbursement to a state is associated with a decrease of -0.316 in the SoTC mean value, indicating higher MSA payments were associated with weaker tobacco control measures within states. In order to achieve the initial objectives of the MSA payments, policy makers should focus on utilizing MSA payments strictly on tobacco control activities across states.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHumansModels, StatisticalRegression AnalysisState GovernmentTobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25506827
PMCPMC4266515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.