Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25506787›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2015

Genetically encoded molecular biosensors to image histone methylation in living animals.

Thillai V Sekar, Kira Foygel, Juri G Gelovani, Ramasamy Paulmurugan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Studying Chromatin Epigenetics with Fluorescence Microscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coordinated histone modifications and chromatin reorganization in a single cell revealed by FRET biosensors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  6. The ABCs of PTMs.Nature chemical biology · 2018
    Article
  7. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying nervous system diseases.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thillai V SekarMolecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Bio-X Program, Stanford University School of Medicine , 318 Campus Drive, East Wing, 1st Floor, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Kira Foygel
Juri G Gelovani
Ramasamy Paulmurugan
Stanford University · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Molecular Sensors for Imaging Histone Methylations in Living AnimalsR01CA161091 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PAULMURUGAN, RAMASAMY · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161091NCI NIH HHS R01CA161091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-translational addition of methyl groups to the amino terminal tails of histone proteins regulates cellular gene expression at various stages of development and the pathogenesis of cellular diseases, including cancer. Several enzymes that modulate these post-translational modifications of histones are promising targets for development of small molecule drugs. However, there is no promising real-time histone methylation detection tool currently available to screen and validate potential small molecule histone methylation modulators in small animal models. With this in mind, we developed genetically encoded molecular biosensors based on the split-enzyme complementation approach for in vitro and in vivo imaging of lysine 9 (H3-K9 sensor) and lysine 27 (H3-K27 sensor) methylation marks of histone 3. These methylation sensors were validated in vitro in HEK293T, HepG2, and HeLa cells. The efficiency of the histone methylation sensor was assessed by employing methyltransferase inhibitors (Bix01294 and UNC0638), demethylase inhibitor (JIB-04), and siRNA silencing at the endogenous histone K9-methyltransferase enzyme level. Furthermore, noninvasive bioluminescence imaging of histone methylation sensors confirmed the potential of these sensors in monitoring histone methylation status in response to histone methyltransferase inhibitors in living animals. Experimental results confirmed that the developed H3-K9 and H3-K27 sensors are specific and sensitive to image the drug-induced histone methylation changes in living animals. These novel histone methylation sensors can facilitate the in vitro screening and in vivo characterization of new histone methyltransferase inhibitors and accelerate the pace of introduction of epigenetic therapies into the clinic.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAcetylationAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesEnzyme InhibitorsHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHep G2 CellsHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesHistonesHumansLysineMethylationEnzyme InhibitorsHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesHistonesLysine

Identifiers

PMID25506787
PMCPMC4303335
OpenAlexW1969908088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.