Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25506602›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of stress2015

Behavioral control blunts reactions to contemporaneous and future adverse events: medial prefrontal cortex plasticity and a corticostriatal network.

Steven F Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of stress, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Active Avoidance: Neural Mechanisms and Attenuation of Pavlovian Conditioned Responding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Elevated prefrontal dopamine interferes with the stress-buffering properties of behavioral control in female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Alcohol's effects during uncertain and uncontrollable stressors in the laboratory.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven F MaierDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience and Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO USA 80309-0345, 001 303 492-6275.

Funding

Stressor Controllability: The Role of the mPFC in Producing ResiliencyR01MH050479 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MICHAEL V BARATTA, STEVEN F MAIER · 1993 to 2026
$7.9M
STRESSOR CONTROLLABILITY: ANXIETY AND SEROTONINR37MH050479 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MAIER, STEVEN F · 1997 to 2006
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050479NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH050479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been known for many years that the ability to exert behavioral control over an adverse event blunts the behavioral and neurochemical impact of the event. More recently, it has become clear that the experience of behavioral control over adverse events also produces enduring changes that reduce the effects of subsequent negative events, even if they are uncontrollable and quite different from the original event controlled. This review focuses on the mechanism by which control both limits the impact of the stressor being experienced and produces enduring, trans-situational "immunization". The evidence will suggest that control is detected by a corticostriatal circuit involving the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the posterior dorsomedial striatum (DMS). Once control is detected, other mPFC neurons that project to stress-responsive brainstem (dorsal raphe nucleus, DRN) and limbic (amygdala) structures exert top-down inhibitory control over the activation of these structures that is produced by the adverse event. These structures, such as the DRN and amygdala, in turn regulate the proximate mediators of the behavioral and physiological responses produced by adverse events, and so control blunts these responses. Importantly, the joint occurrence of control and adverse events seems to produce enduring plastic changes in the top-down inhibitory mPFC system such that this system is now activated by later adverse events even if they are uncontrollable, thereby reducing the impact of these events. Other issues are discussed that include a) whether other processes such as safety signals and exercise, that lead to resistance/resilience, also use the mPFC circuitry or do so in other ways; b) whether control has similar effects and neural mediation in humans, and c) the relationship of this work to clinical phenomena.

Indexed as

medial prefrontal cortexplasticityresiliencestressor controllabilitystriatumtop-down inhibition

Identifiers

PMID25506602
PMCPMC4260419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.