ArticleBioMed research international2014
The significance of body mass index in calculating the cut-off points for low muscle mass in the elderly: methodological issues.
Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of a 12-Week Omega-3 Supplementation on Body Composition, Muscle Strength and Physical Performance in Elderly Individuals with Decreased Muscle Mass.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015Trial
- Protocol for an aged cohort study to create a single indicator that expresses the trajectory of intrinsic capacity over the years and its relation to functional abilities.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
- Myostatin and Activin A as Biomarkers of Sarcopenia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Article
- Polish version of SARC-F to assess sarcopenia in older adults: An examination of reliability and validity.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Some clarifications of terminology may facilitate sarcopenia assessment.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2020Article
- Article
- Sarcopenia and osteoporosis in Portuguese centenarians.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCut-off points (COPs) for appendicular lean mass (ALM) index, essential to define low muscle mass (LMM) in the elderly, have never been officially defined for Poland. The aim of the study was to establish them. Additionally, the significance of body mass index (BMI) for correctly defining the COPs in a young, healthy reference group was assessed.
methodsThe study was composed of reference group (n = 1113) and the elderly group (n = 200). In all subjects, body composition was assessed by bioimpedance analysis, and ALM index was calculated. Next, COPs (kg/m(2)) were set up for the whole reference group and for particular subgroups with different BMIs separately. They were used to diagnose sarcopenia in the elderly.
resultsCOP for all young females was 5.37 (COP-F), while it was equal to 5.52 (COP-F2) when only those with a recommended BMI (18.50-24.99 kg/m(2)) were taken into consideration. For males, it was 7.32 and 7.29, respectively. Only 7% of elderly females had LMM based on COP-F and 15% had LMM based on COP-F2 (P < 0.05); for males, the percentages were 18% and 16%, respectively.
conclusionsCOPs for LMM for Poland are 5.52 kg/m(2) (females) and 7.29 kg/m(2) (males). The reference group BMI is an important factor in establishing COPs for low muscle mass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.