Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25506555›Full record

ArticleIndian dermatology online journal2014

Sexually transmitted infections in women: A correlation of clinical and laboratory diagnosis in cases of vaginal discharge syndrome.

Vidyalaxmi Chauhan, Maitri Shah, Sejal Thakkar, Sangita V Patel, Yogesh Marfatia

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian dermatology online journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Study Models forMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Concordance Between Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Abnormal Vaginal Discharge in Chilean Women.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence ofIndian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vidyalaxmi ChauhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India.
Maitri ShahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India.
Sejal ThakkarDepartment of Skin and VD, GMERS Medical College, Gotri, Baroda, Gujarat, India.
Sangita V PatelDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India.
Yogesh MarfatiaDepartment of Skin and VD, Government Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India.
Sir Sayajirao General Hospital Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study compares the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of vaginal discharge syndrome. SETTINGS AND

designThis cross-sectional study was carried out at the gynaecology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India. MATERIAL AND

methodsTotal of 180 females diagnosed as vaginal discharge or cervicitis based on syndromic approach and were recruited for the study. Their clinical profile was noted and they were investigated for bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, candidiasis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia infection.

resultsLower abdominal pain (35%) followed by burning micturition (23.9%) were the common associated complaints. Bacterial vaginosis was the most common clinical diagnosis, while trichomoniasis was least common. Upon laboratory investigation, 35.6% of cases of vaginal discharge and 12% of cases of cervicitis tested positive. Percentage of cases confirmed by laboratory investigation was 50, 27.8 and 41.7 for bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis and candidiasis respectively.

conclusionAmong all the females diagnosed as vaginal discharge syndrome, a very small percentage actually turned out to be positive upon laboratory testing.

Indexed as

Clinical diagnosislaboratory diagnosissexually transmitted infectionsvaginal discharge syndromewomen

Identifiers

PMID25506555
PMCPMC4252942
OpenAlexW2099645346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.