Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25506520›Full record

ReviewApplications in plant sciences2014

A review of the prevalence, utility, and caveats of using chloroplast simple sequence repeats for studies of plant biology.

Gregory L Wheeler, Hanna E Dorman, Alenda Buchanan, Lavanya Challagundla, Lisa E Wallace

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applications in plant sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Complete chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  9. The complete chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in genetics · 2026
    Article
  10. Chloroplast Genome Diversity and Marker Potentials of DiverseInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. New Insights Into The Evolution of Chloroplast Genomes inEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2023
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregory L WheelerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 USA.
Hanna E DormanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 USA.
Alenda BuchananDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 USA.
Lavanya ChallagundlaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 USA.
Lisa E WallaceDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762 USA.
Mississippi State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellites occur in all plant genomes and provide useful markers for studies of genetic diversity and structure. Chloroplast microsatellites (cpSSRs) are frequently targeted because they are more easily isolated than nuclear microsatellites. Here, we quantified the frequency and uses of cpSSRs based on a literature review of over 400 studies published 1995-2013. These markers are an important and economical tool for plant biologists and continue to be used alongside modern genomics approaches to study genetic diversity and structure, evolutionary history, and hybridization in native and agricultural species. Studies using species-specific primers reported a greater number of polymorphic loci than those employing universal primers. A major disadvantage to cpSSRs is fragment size homoplasy; therefore, we documented its occurrence at several cpSSR loci within and between species of Acmispon (Fabaceae). Based on our empirical data set, we recommend targeted sequencing of a subset of samples combined with fragment genotyping as a cost-efficient, data-rich approach to the use of cpSSRs and as a test of homoplasy. The availability of genomic resources for plants aids in the development of primers for new study systems, thereby enhancing the utility of cpSSRs across plant biology.

Indexed as

chloroplast microsatellitecpSSRplastid microsatellitepopulation geneticssize homoplasy

Identifiers

PMID25506520
PMCPMC4259455
OpenAlexW2140691390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.