Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25506350›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014

Transcript abundance on its own cannot be used to infer fluxes in central metabolism.

Jörg Schwender, Christina König, Matthias Klapperstück, Nicolas Heinzel, Eberhard Munz, Inga Hebbelmann, Jordan O Hay, Peter Denolf, Stefanie De Bodt, Henning Redestig and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Metabolic rewiring and biomass redistribution enable optimized mixotrophic growth in Chlamydomonas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Ectopic expression of theFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptome Analysis and Identification of Lipid Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jörg SchwenderBrookhaven National Laboratory, Department of Biological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Upton, NY, USA.
Christina KönigLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben, Germany.
Matthias KlapperstückLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben, Germany.
Nicolas HeinzelLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben, Germany.
Eberhard MunzLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben, Germany ; University of Würzburg, Institute of Experimental Physics 5 Würzburg, Germany.
Inga HebbelmannBrookhaven National Laboratory, Department of Biological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Upton, NY, USA.
Jordan O HayBrookhaven National Laboratory, Department of Biological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Upton, NY, USA.
Peter DenolfBayer CropScience NV, Trait Research Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Stefanie De BodtBayer CropScience NV, Trait Research Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Henning RedestigBayer CropScience NV, Trait Research Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Evelyne CaesteckerBayer CropScience NV, Trait Research Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Peter M JakobUniversity of Würzburg, Institute of Experimental Physics 5 Würzburg, Germany.
Ljudmilla BorisjukLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben, Germany.
Hardy RolletschekLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An attempt has been made to define the extent to which metabolic flux in central plant metabolism is reflected by changes in the transcriptome and metabolome, based on an analysis of in vitro cultured immature embryos of two oilseed rape (Brassica napus) accessions which contrast for seed lipid accumulation. Metabolic flux analysis (MFA) was used to constrain a flux balance metabolic model which included 671 biochemical and transport reactions within the central metabolism. This highly confident flux information was eventually used for comparative analysis of flux vs. transcript (metabolite). Metabolite profiling succeeded in identifying 79 intermediates within the central metabolism, some of which differed quantitatively between the two accessions and displayed a significant shift corresponding to flux. An RNA-Seq based transcriptome analysis revealed a large number of genes which were differentially transcribed in the two accessions, including some enzymes/proteins active in major metabolic pathways. With a few exceptions, differential activity in the major pathways (glycolysis, TCA cycle, amino acid, and fatty acid synthesis) was not reflected in contrasting abundances of the relevant transcripts. The conclusion was that transcript abundance on its own cannot be used to infer metabolic activity/fluxes in central plant metabolism. This limitation needs to be borne in mind in evaluating transcriptome data and designing metabolic engineering experiments.

Indexed as

13C-metabolic flux analysisBrassica napuscentral metabolismflux balance analysislipid biosynthesisoilseedstargeted metabolite profiling

Identifiers

PMID25506350
PMCPMC4246676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.