Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25506283›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2014

Optimizing dendritic cell-based approaches for cancer immunotherapy.

Jashodeep Datta, Julia H Terhune, Lea Lowenfeld, Jessica A Cintolo, Shuwen Xu, Robert E Roses, Brian J Czerniecki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Roles of Antimicrobial Peptides in Gynecological Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer Treatment.Iranian biomedical journal · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Beyond Regenerative Medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  14. Dendritic cells loaded with CD44Oncology letters · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Dendritic cell trafficking in tumor-bearing mice.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jashodeep DattaDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Julia H TerhuneDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lea LowenfeldDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jessica A CintoloDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shuwen XuDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert E RosesDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brian J CzernieckiDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DC) are professional antigen-presenting cells uniquely suited for cancer immunotherapy. They induce primary immune responses, potentiate the effector functions of previously primed T-lymphocytes, and orchestrate communication between innate and adaptive immunity. The remarkable diversity of cytokine activation regimens, DC maturation states, and antigen-loading strategies employed in current DC-based vaccine design reflect an evolving, but incomplete, understanding of optimal DC immunobiology. In the clinical realm, existing DC-based cancer immunotherapy efforts have yielded encouraging but inconsistent results. Despite recent U.S. Federal and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of DC-based sipuleucel-T for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, clinically effective DC immunotherapy as monotherapy for a majority of tumors remains a distant goal. Recent work has identified strategies that may allow for more potent "next-generation" DC vaccines. Additionally, multimodality approaches incorporating DC-based immunotherapy may improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesDendritic CellsDrug DesignHumansImmunotherapyTreatment OutcomeCancer Vaccinescancerchemotherapycombination therapydendritic cellimmunotherapyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID25506283
PMCPMC4257036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.