Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25505891›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014

Color-discrimination threshold determination using pseudoisochromatic test plates.

Kaiva Jurasevska, Maris Ozolinsh, Sergejs Fomins, Ausma Gutmane, Brigita Zutere, Anete Pausus, Varis Karitans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaiva JurasevskaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics and Mathematics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia.
Maris OzolinshDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics and Mathematics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia ; Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia.
Sergejs FominsDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics and Mathematics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia ; Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia.
Ausma GutmaneDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics and Mathematics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia.
Brigita ZutereFaculty of Biology, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia.
Anete PaususDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Physics and Mathematics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia.
Varis KaritansInstitute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia Riga, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We produced a set of pseudoisochromatic plates for determining individual color-difference thresholds to assess test performance and test properties, and analyzed the results. We report a high test validity and classification ability for the deficiency type and severity level [comparable to that of the fourth edition of the Hardy-Rand-Rittler (HRR) test]. We discuss changes of the acceptable chromatic shifts from the protan and deutan confusion lines along the CIE xy diagram, and the high correlation of individual color-difference thresholds and the red-green discrimination index. Color vision was tested using an Oculus HMC anomaloscope, a Farnsworth D15, and an HRR test on 273 schoolchildren, and 57 other subjects with previously diagnosed red-green color-vision deficiency.

Indexed as

color measurementcolor perceptioncolor visioncolor-vision defectscolor-vision deficiencypsychophysicsvision system

Identifiers

PMID25505891
PMCPMC4245893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.