ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2014
Comparative proteomic analysis of indica and japonica rice varieties.
Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrasting starch digestion and physiochemical characteristics betweenCurrent research in food science · 2025Article
- HarnessingAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigation on Nutritional, Phytochemical, and Antioxidant Abilities of Various Traditional Rice Varieties.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Enhancement Methods of Antioxidant Capacity in Rice Bran: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The rice EP3 and OsFBK1 E3 ligases alter plant architecture and flower development, and affect transcript accumulation of microRNA pathway genes and their targets.Plant biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Comparative analysis of the transcriptomes of two rice subspecies during domestication.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Variant biochemical responses: intrinsic and adaptive system for ecologically different rice varieties.Journal of crop science and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Proteomic profiling reveals differentially expressed proteins associated with amylose accumulation during rice grain filling.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Proteomic analysis of a clavata-like phenotype mutant in Brassica napus.Genetics and molecular biology · 2020Article
- Global Transcriptome and Co-Expression Network Analysis Reveal Contrasting Response ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Lectin Sequence Distribution in QTLs from Rice (Oryza sativa) Suggest A Role in Morphological Traits and Stress Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Evolutionary relationships and expression analysis of EUL domain proteins in rice (Oryza sativa).Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Article
- Identification and Characterization of BmVta1, a Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) Homologue for Vta1 That is Up-Regulated in Development.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2017Article
- Selective sweep with significant positive selection serves as the driving force for the differentiation of japonica and indica rice cultivars.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Reconstruction ofFrontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Ascribing Functions to Genes: Journey Towards Genetic Improvement of Rice Via Functional Genomics.Current genomics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indica and japonica are two main subspecies of Asian cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) that differ clearly in morphological and agronomic traits, in physiological and biochemical characteristics and in their genomic structure. However, the proteins and genes responsible for these differences remain poorly characterized. In this study, proteomic tools, including two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, were used to globally identify proteins that differed between two sequenced rice varieties (93-11 and Nipponbare). In all, 47 proteins that differed significantly between 93-11 and Nipponbare were identified using mass spectrometry and database searches. Interestingly, seven proteins were expressed only in Nipponbare and one protein was expressed specifically in 93-11; these differences were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR and proteomic analysis of other indica and japonica rice varieties. This is the first report to successfully demonstrate differences in the protein composition of indica and japonica rice varieties and to identify candidate proteins and genes for future investigation of their roles in the differentiation of indica and japonica rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.