Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25505651›Full record

ArticleIn silico pharmacology2013

Using Bayesian-PBPK modeling for assessment of inter-individual variability and subgroup stratification.

Markus Krauss, Rolf Burghaus, Jörg Lippert, Mikko Niemi, Pertti Neuvonen, Andreas Schuppert, Stefan Willmann, Lars Kuepfer, Linus Görlitz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In silico pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bayesian PBPK modeling using R/Stan/Torsten and Julia/SciML/Turing.Jl.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Are Non-animal Systemic Safety Assessments Protective? A Toolbox and Workflow.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A PBPK model recapitulates early kinetics of anti-PEG antibody-mediated clearance of PEG-liposomes.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational Modeling in Liver Surgery.Frontiers in physiology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Applied Concepts in PBPK Modeling: How to Build a PBPK/PD Model.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus KraussBayer Technology Services GmbH, Computational Systems Biology, Leverkusen, 51368 Germany ; RWTH Aachen, Schinkelstr, Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Sciences, Aachen, 2, 52062 Germany.
Rolf BurghausClinical Pharmacometrics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, 42117 Germany.
Jörg LippertClinical Pharmacometrics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, 42117 Germany.
Mikko NiemiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ; HUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Pertti NeuvonenHUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Andreas SchuppertBayer Technology Services GmbH, Computational Systems Biology, Leverkusen, 51368 Germany ; RWTH Aachen, Schinkelstr, Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Sciences, Aachen, 2, 52062 Germany.
Stefan WillmannBayer Technology Services GmbH, Computational Systems Biology, Leverkusen, 51368 Germany.
Lars KuepferBayer Technology Services GmbH, Computational Systems Biology, Leverkusen, 51368 Germany.
Linus GörlitzBayer Technology Services GmbH, Computational Systems Biology, Leverkusen, 51368 Germany.
Bayer (Germany) · DEHelsinki University Hospital · FIRWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInter-individual variability in clinical endpoints and occurrence of potentially severe adverse effects represent an enormous challenge in drug development at all phases of (pre-)clinical research. To ensure patient safety it is important to identify adverse events or critical subgroups within the population as early as possible. Hence, a comprehensive understanding of the processes governing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is of utmost importance. In this paper we combine Bayesian statistics with detailed mechanistic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. On the example of pravastatin we demonstrate that this combination provides a powerful tool to investigate inter-individual variability in groups of patients and to identify clinically relevant homogenous subgroups in an unsupervised approach. Since PBPK models allow the identification of physiological, drug-specific and genotype-specific knowledge separately, our approach supports knowledge-based extrapolation to other drugs or populations.

methodsPBPK models are based on generic distribution models and extensive collections of physiological parameters and allow a mechanistic investigation of drug distribution and drug action. To systematically account for parameter variability within patient populations, a Bayesian-PBPK approach is developed rigorously quantifying the probability of a parameter given the amount of information contained in the measured data. Since these parameter distributions are high-dimensional, a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is used, where the physiological and drug-specific parameters are considered in separate blocks.

resultsConsidering pravastatin pharmacokinetics as an application example, Bayesian-PBPK is used to investigate inter-individual variability in a cohort of 10 patients. Correlation analyses infer structural information about the PBPK model. Moreover, homogeneous subpopulations are identified a posteriori by examining the parameter distributions, which can even be assigned to a polymorphism in the hepatic organ anion transporter OATP1B1.

conclusionsThe presented Bayesian-PBPK approach systematically characterizes inter-individual variability within a population by updating prior knowledge about physiological parameters with new experimental data. Moreover, clinically relevant homogeneous subpopulations can be mechanistically identified. The large scale PBPK model separates physiological and drug-specific knowledge which allows, in combination with Bayesian approaches, the iterative assessment of specific populations by integrating information from several drugs.

Indexed as

Bayesian approachesDrug developmentInter-individual variabilityMarkov chain Monte CarloOATP1B1Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelingPravastatin

Identifiers

PMID25505651
PMCPMC4230716
OpenAlexW2154005247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.