Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25505534›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2014

Plant-derived differences in the composition of aphid honeydew and their effects on colonies of aphid-tending ants.

Elizabeth G Pringle, Alexandria Novo, Ian Ableson, Raymond V Barbehenn, Rachel L Vannette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Combined Elevation of Temperature and COJournal of chemical ecology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Attraction of FemaleInsects · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth G PringleMichigan Society of Fellows, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109 ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109 ; School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109.
Alexandria NovoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109.
Ian AblesonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109.
Raymond V BarbehennDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109 ; Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109.
Rachel L VannetteDepartment of Biology, Stanford University Stanford, California, 94305.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plant-ant-hemipteran interactions, ants visit plants to consume the honeydew produced by phloem-feeding hemipterans. If genetically based differences in plant phloem chemistry change the chemical composition of hemipteran honeydew, then the plant's genetic constitution could have indirect effects on ants via the hemipterans. If such effects change ant behavior, they could feed back to affect the plant itself. We compared the chemical composition of honeydews produced by Aphis nerii aphid clones on two milkweed congeners, Asclepias curassavica and Asclepias incarnata, and we measured the responses of experimental Linepithema humile ant colonies to these honeydews. The compositions of secondary metabolites, sugars, and amino acids differed significantly in the honeydews from the two plant species. Ant colonies feeding on honeydew derived from A. incarnata recruited in higher numbers to artificial diet, maintained higher queen and worker dry weight, and sustained marginally more workers than ants feeding on honeydew derived from A. curassavica. Ants feeding on honeydew from A. incarnata were also more exploratory in behavioral assays than ants feeding from A. curassavica. Despite performing better when feeding on the A. incarnata honeydew, ant workers marginally preferred honeydew from A. curassavica to honeydew from A. incarnata when given a choice. Our results demonstrate that plant congeners can exert strong indirect effects on ant colonies by means of plant-species-specific differences in aphid honeydew chemistry. Moreover, these effects changed ant behavior and thus could feed back to affect plant performance in the field.

Indexed as

Aphis neriiAsclepias spp.carbohydratecardenolidesLinepithema humilemilkweedphloem chemistrytritrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID25505534
PMCPMC4242560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.