Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25505449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Multiple sulfur isotope signatures of sulfite and thiosulfate reduction by the model dissimilatory sulfate-reducer, Desulfovibrio alaskensis str. G20.

William D Leavitt, Renata Cummins, Marian L Schmidt, Min S Sim, Shuhei Ono, Alexander S Bradley, David T Johnston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proteomic and Isotopic Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

William D LeavittDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA.
Renata CumminsDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA.
Marian L SchmidtDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Min S SimDepartment of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ; Division of Geological Sciences, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, USA.
Shuhei OnoDepartment of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alexander S BradleyDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA.
David T JohnstonDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USPlanetary Science Institute · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dissimilatory sulfate reduction serves as a key metabolic carbon remineralization process in anoxic marine environments. Sulfate reducing microorganisms can impart a wide range in mass-dependent sulfur isotopic fractionation. As such, the presence and relative activity of these organisms is identifiable from geological materials. By extension, sulfur isotope records are used to infer the redox balance of marine sedimentary environments, and the oxidation state of Earth's oceans and atmosphere. However, recent work suggests that our understanding of microbial sulfate reduction (MSRs) may be missing complexity associated with the presence and role of key chemical intermediates in the reductive process. This study provides a test of proposed metabolic models of sulfate reduction by growing an axenic culture of the well-studied MSRs, Desulfovibrio alaskensis strain G20, under electron donor limited conditions on the terminal electron acceptors sulfate, sulfite or thiosulfate, and tracking the multiple S isotopic consequences of each condition set. The dissimilatory reduction of thiosulfate and sulfite produce unique minor isotope effects, as compared to the reduction of sulfate. Further, these experiments reveal a complex biochemistry associated with sulfite reduction. That is, under high sulfite concentrations, sulfur is shuttled to an intermediate pool of thiosulfate. Site-specific isotope fractionation (within thiosulfate) is very large ((34)ε ~ 30‰) while terminal product sulfide carries only a small fractionation from the initial sulfite ((34)ε < 10‰): a signature similar in magnitude to sulfate and thiosulfate reduction. Together these findings show that microbial sulfate reduction (MSR) is highly sensitive to the concentration of environmentally important sulfur-cycle intermediates (sulfite and thiosulfate), especially when thiosulfate and the large site-specific isotope effects are involved.

Indexed as

biogeochemical sulfur cyclemicrobial sulfate reductionmultiple sulfur isotopessulfur intermediatesthionates

Identifiers

PMID25505449
PMCPMC4243691
OpenAlexW1564226031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.