Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25505148›Full record

ArticleBiology open2014

Influence of environmental information in natural scenes and the effects of motion adaptation on a fly motion-sensitive neuron during simulated flight.

Thomas W Ullrich, Roland Kern, Martin Egelhaaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Path integration and optic flow in flying insects: a review of current evidence.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Optic flow based spatial vision in insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantitative Characterization of Output from the Directionally Selective Visual Interneuron H1 in the Grey Flesh FlyJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas W UllrichDepartment of Neurobiology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany Center of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC), Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1/Zehlendorfer Damm 201, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany.
Roland KernDepartment of Neurobiology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany Center of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC), Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1/Zehlendorfer Damm 201, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany.
Martin EgelhaafDepartment of Neurobiology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany Center of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC), Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1/Zehlendorfer Damm 201, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany martin.egelhaaf@uni-bielefeld.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaining information about the spatial layout of natural scenes is a challenging task that flies need to solve, especially when moving at high velocities. A group of motion sensitive cells in the lobula plate of flies is supposed to represent information about self-motion as well as the environment. Relevant environmental features might be the nearness of structures, influencing retinal velocity during translational self-motion, and the brightness contrast. We recorded the responses of the H1 cell, an individually identifiable lobula plate tangential cell, during stimulation with image sequences, simulating translational motion through natural sceneries with a variety of differing depth structures. A correlation was found between the average nearness of environmental structures within large parts of the cell's receptive field and its response across a variety of scenes, but no correlation was found between the brightness contrast of the stimuli and the cell response. As a consequence of motion adaptation resulting from repeated translation through the environment, the time-dependent response modulations induced by the spatial structure of the environment were increased relatively to the background activity of the cell. These results support the hypothesis that some lobula plate tangential cells do not only serve as sensors of self-motion, but also as a part of a neural system that processes information about the spatial layout of natural scenes.

Indexed as

AdaptationContrastFlyNatural imagesNearnessNeural activitySpatial vision

Identifiers

PMID25505148
PMCPMC4295162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.