Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25505107›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Neural correlates of target selection for reaching movements in superior colliculus.

Joo-Hyun Song, Robert M McPeek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. No one knows what attention is.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joo-Hyun SongDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California; and joo-hyun_song@brown.edu.
Robert M McPeekThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California; and Graduate Center for Vision Research and SUNY Eye Institute, SUNY College of Optometry, New York, New York.

Funding

Cortical &Subcortical Control of Saccades and AttentionR01EY014885 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI MCPEEK, ROBERT M · 2003 to 2017
$4.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014885NEI NIH HHS R01-EY-014885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently demonstrated that inactivation of the primate superior colliculus (SC) causes a deficit in target selection for arm-reaching movements when the reach target is located in the inactivated field (Song JH, Rafal RD, McPeek RM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: E1433-E1440, 2011). This is consistent with the notion that the SC is part of a general-purpose target selection network beyond eye movements. To understand better the role of SC activity in reach target selection, we examined how individual SC neurons in the intermediate layers discriminate a reach target from distractors. Monkeys reached to touch a color oddball target among distractors while maintaining fixation. We found that many SC neurons robustly discriminate the goal of the reaching movement before the onset of the reach even though no saccade is made. To identify these cells in the context of conventional SC cell classification schemes, we also recorded visual, delay-period, and saccade-related responses in a delayed saccade task. On average, SC cells that discriminated the reach target from distractors showed significantly higher visual and delay-period activity than nondiscriminating cells, but there was no significant difference in saccade-related activity. Whereas a majority of SC neurons that discriminated the reach target showed significant delay-period activity, all nondiscriminating cells lacked such activity. We also found that some cells without delay-period activity did discriminate the reach target from distractors. We conclude that the majority of intermediate-layer SC cells discriminate a reach target from distractors, consistent with the idea that the SC contains a priority map used for effector-independent target selection.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalMovementPsychomotor PerformanceAnimalsHandMacaca mulattaNeuronsSuperior Colliculireachingsuperior colliculustarget selection

Identifiers

PMID25505107
PMCPMC4346726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.