ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015
Putative mechanisms mediating tolerance for audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repeatedly experiencing the McGurk effect induces long-lasting changes in auditory speech perception.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Cross-Modal Tinnitus Remediation: A Tentative Theoretical Framework.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Synthetic faces generated with the facial action coding system or deep neural networks improve speech-in-noise perception, but not as much as real faces.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- The effect of prestimulus low-frequency neural oscillations on the temporal perception of audiovisual speech.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- The interplay between audiovisual temporal synchrony and semantic congruency in the cross-modal boost of the visual target discrimination during the attentional blink.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Neural Basis of the Sound-Symbolic Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pseudowords and Visual Shapes.Multisensory research · 2021Article
- Audio-Visual Causality and Stimulus Reliability Affect Audio-Visual Synchrony Perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Cross-Modal Suppressive Role of Visual Context on Speech Intelligibility: An ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Audio-visual combination of syllables involves time-sensitive dynamics following from fusion failure.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Neural Correlates of Modality-Sensitive Deviance Detection in the Audiovisual Oddball Paradigm.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Neural evidence accounting for interindividual variability of the McGurk illusion.Neuroscience letters · 2019Article
- Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Neurophysiology underlying influence of stimulus reliability on audiovisual integration.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018Article
- Neural basis of the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visuospatial elevation.Neuropsychologia · 2018Article
- Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Tolerance for audiovisual asynchrony is enhanced by the spectrotemporal fidelity of the speaker's mouth movements and speech.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Audiovisual (AV) speech perception is robust to temporal asynchronies between visual and auditory stimuli. We investigated the neural mechanisms that facilitate tolerance for audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony (AVOA) with EEG. Individuals were presented with AV words that were asynchronous in onsets of voice and mouth movement and judged whether they were synchronous or not. Behaviorally, individuals tolerated (perceived as synchronous) longer AVOAs when mouth movement preceded the speech (V-A) stimuli than when the speech preceded mouth movement (A-V). Neurophysiologically, the P1-N1-P2 auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), time-locked to sound onsets and known to arise in and surrounding the primary auditory cortex (PAC), were smaller for the in-sync than the out-of-sync percepts. Spectral power of oscillatory activity in the beta band (14-30 Hz) following the AEPs was larger during the in-sync than out-of-sync perception for both A-V and V-A conditions. However, alpha power (8-14 Hz), also following AEPs, was larger for the in-sync than out-of-sync percepts only in the V-A condition. These results demonstrate that AVOA tolerance is enhanced by inhibiting low-level auditory activity (e.g., AEPs representing generators in and surrounding PAC) that code for acoustic onsets. By reducing sensitivity to acoustic onsets, visual-to-auditory onset mapping is weakened, allowing for greater AVOA tolerance. In contrast, beta and alpha results suggest the involvement of higher-level neural processes that may code for language cues (phonetic, lexical), selective attention, and binding of AV percepts, allowing for wider neural windows of temporal integration, i.e., greater AVOA tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.