Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25505102›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Putative mechanisms mediating tolerance for audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony.

Jyoti Bhat, Lee M Miller, Mark A Pitt, Antoine J Shahin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jyoti BhatDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio;
Lee M MillerCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California; Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, California; and.
Mark A PittDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Antoine J ShahinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California; ajshahin@ucdavis.edu.
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Audiovisual integration for spoken language in adverse listening situationsR01DC013543 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED · PI SHAHIN, ANTOINE J · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Detection/Dysplastic Epithelium/Gastrointestinal TractR33CA094304 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND · PI SIVAK, MICHAEL V · 2002 to 2004
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA094304NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Audiovisual (AV) speech perception is robust to temporal asynchronies between visual and auditory stimuli. We investigated the neural mechanisms that facilitate tolerance for audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony (AVOA) with EEG. Individuals were presented with AV words that were asynchronous in onsets of voice and mouth movement and judged whether they were synchronous or not. Behaviorally, individuals tolerated (perceived as synchronous) longer AVOAs when mouth movement preceded the speech (V-A) stimuli than when the speech preceded mouth movement (A-V). Neurophysiologically, the P1-N1-P2 auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), time-locked to sound onsets and known to arise in and surrounding the primary auditory cortex (PAC), were smaller for the in-sync than the out-of-sync percepts. Spectral power of oscillatory activity in the beta band (14-30 Hz) following the AEPs was larger during the in-sync than out-of-sync perception for both A-V and V-A conditions. However, alpha power (8-14 Hz), also following AEPs, was larger for the in-sync than out-of-sync percepts only in the V-A condition. These results demonstrate that AVOA tolerance is enhanced by inhibiting low-level auditory activity (e.g., AEPs representing generators in and surrounding PAC) that code for acoustic onsets. By reducing sensitivity to acoustic onsets, visual-to-auditory onset mapping is weakened, allowing for greater AVOA tolerance. In contrast, beta and alpha results suggest the involvement of higher-level neural processes that may code for language cues (phonetic, lexical), selective attention, and binding of AV percepts, allowing for wider neural windows of temporal integration, i.e., greater AVOA tolerance.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCortical SynchronizationEvoked Potentials, AuditorySpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAlpha RhythmAuditory CortexBeta RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMouthMovementPhotic StimulationVoicealpha band activityaudiovisual stimulus onset asynchronyauditory evoked potentialsbeta band activityEEGoscillatory activity

Identifiers

PMID25505102
PMCPMC11961060
OpenAlexW2317366373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.