Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25504534›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2015

Mesh ingrowth with concomitant bacterial infection resulting in inability to explant: a failure of mesh salvage.

M Hanna, S Dissanaike

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M HannaDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street, Room 3A159, Lubbock, TX, 79424, USA, m.hanna@ttuhsc.edu.
S Dissanaike
Texas Tech University · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRemoval is the standard treatment for mesh infection following prosthetic hernia repair. However, certain types of mesh may be less amenable to removal even in the setting of active infection; we present four such cases, all involving the same composite mesh.

methodsFour high-risk patients underwent Parietex mesh implantation for large ventral wall hernias and developed subsequent Staphylococcus infections with attempted explantation of infected mesh and wound care.

resultsThere was inability to completely explant mesh in all four cases, leading to chronic purulent wounds and long-term complications.

conclusionWhile mesh infection is a recognized complication of prosthetic hernia repair, many synthetic meshes form a slimy biofilm and thus can be removed relatively easily. However, the structural qualities of certain types of mesh create ingrowth into tissues even in the setting of infection, resulting in inability to explant with subsequent long-term chronic wound complications.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDebridementDevice RemovalFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis-Related InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsSurgical MeshSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment FailureWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID25504534
OpenAlexW2046114888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.