Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25504462›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

A single institution experience in compliance with universal screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer.

Amy L Hill, Kirandeep K Sumra, Marcia M Russell, James Yoo, Clifford Y Ko, Steven Hart, Zev Wainberg, J Randolph Hecht, Anne Y Lin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A framework to build capacity for a reflex-testing program for Lynch syndrome.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amy L HillDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, 72-247 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Kirandeep K Sumra
Marcia M Russell
James Yoo
Clifford Y Ko
Steven Hart
Zev Wainberg
J Randolph Hecht
Anne Y Lin
University of California, Los Angeles · USTufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Arizona · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of Lynch syndrome has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality among patients and their family members due to beneficial screening and treatment options. Several institutions have begun to adopt universal rather than risk-stratified screening protocols, but the lack of 100 % compliance rates requires identification of system-level interventions to improve screening practices.

objectiveWe aimed to identify patient, tumor, and system factors associated with lack of screening and identify system-based interventions to improve Lynch syndrome screening. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: This study is a retrospective analysis of Lynch syndrome screening among colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery in a single healthcare system. PATIENTS: Two hundred and sixty-two patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer were studied.

main outcome measuresRate of Lynch syndrome screening.

resultsWe identified that 75 % of the total cohort was screened for Lynch syndrome. Of patients under the age of 50, 78 % percent were screened. Lower screening rates were found among patients with complete pathologic tumor response and lower pathologic stage of tumor. Higher screening rates were found at the academic hospital and with colorectal surgeons. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower screening rates were associated with community hospital location (OR, 0.22; 95 % CI, 0.08-0.56). LIMITATIONS: Results may not be generalizable to different hospital settings.

conclusionsSeveral potential system-level interventions were identified to improve screening rates including an emphasis on improved provider communication.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerGuideline AdherenceAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25504462
OpenAlexW1971205898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.