Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2015
Stand-alone mapping using different transluminal mapping catheters--an accurate and safe way to isolate all pulmonary veins with the cryoballoon?
Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Representation of Women in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Pulmonary vein isolation using second-generation single-shot devices: not all the same?Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021Trial
- Effect of air removal with extracorporeal balloon inflation on incidence of asymptomatic cerebral embolism during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: A prospective randomized study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCryoballoon isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVI) is an effective and safe method in the treatment of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The circular mapping catheter Achieve® (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, USA) can be introduced into the pulmonary vein (PV) through the inner lumen of the balloon catheter, allowing online mapping of the PV electrograms during ablation. We prospectively compared the accuracy of this catheter in both available sizes to a standard circular mapping catheter (SCMC) in order to determine bidirectional PV block.
methodsPatients with symptomatic PAF underwent cryoballoon ablation using either the Achieve® 15-mm catheter (group 1, 15 patients) or the Achieve® 20 mm (group 2, 15 patients). PV potentials were recorded using Achieve® before, during, and after ablation, and exit block was obtained by pacing from inside the PV. Accuracy of PV potential detection was controlled by a SCMC before and after ablation.
resultsRate of PV which could be isolated exclusively using the Achieve® as guidewire was 98 % (59/60) in group 1 and 93 % (57/60) in group 2. Online signal recording during ablation was possible in 40 and 60 % of PV (p = 0.037), respectively. Final Achieve® diagnosis was accurate in 55/60 (92 %) of the PVs and 12/15 (80 %) of patients in group 1 and 60/60 (100 %) of PV and 15/15 (100 %) of patients in group 2.
conclusionStand-alone mapping using Achieve® 15 mm resulted in a significant lack of diagnostic accuracy. Achieve® 20 mm provided excellent diagnostic accuracy comparable to a SCMC and should be preferentially used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.