ArticlePloS one2014
The clinical significance of DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR, which are novel markers expressed in human colon cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mendelian randomization analysis of plasma levels of CD209 and MICB proteins and the risk of varicose veins of lower extremities.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of blood diagnostic markers in colorectal cancer.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Pooled it
- Targeting pattern recognition receptors for cancer therapy: Mechanisms and strategies.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- DC-SIGN (CD209)-mediated interactions between bacteria, lung cancer tissues, and macrophages promote cancer metastasis.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Small molecules as ligands in the tuning of immune regulatory receptors.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Colorectal cancer screening: A review of current knowledge and progress in research.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Design and Fabrication of a 3D-Printed Microfluidic Immunoarray for Ultrasensitive Multiplexed Protein Detection.Micromachines · 2023Article
- The multiple roles of C-type lectin receptors in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- The XPA Protein-Life under Precise Control.Cells · 2022Review
- FOXQ1-mediated SIRT1 upregulation enhances stemness and radio-resistance of colorectal cancer cells and restores intestinal microbiota function by promoting β-catenin nuclear translocation.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022Article
- The Role of C-Type Lectin Receptor Signaling in the Intestinal Microbiota-Inflammation-Cancer Axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Towards Novel Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- CLEC4M overexpression inhibits progression and is associated with a favorable prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- Biomarkers for detecting colorectal cancer non-invasively: DNA, RNA or proteins?World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Review
- Tumor-associated O-glycans of MUC1: Carriers of the glyco-code and targets for cancer vaccine design.Seminars in immunology · 2020Review
- Gastric Damage and Cancer-Associated Biomarkers inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Markers of metastatic colorectal cancer.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2020Review
- Decreased DC-SIGNR expression in hepatocellular carcinoma predicts poor patient prognosis.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- DC-SIGN-LEF1/TCF1-miR-185 feedback loop promotes colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis.Cell death and differentiation · 2020Article
- Myeloid C-type lectin receptors in skin/mucoepithelial diseases and tumors.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColon cancer has always been diagnosed at a late stage, which is associated with poor prognosis. The currently used serum tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 display low sensitivity and specificity and may not have diagnostic value in early stage colon cancer. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify novel serum biomarkers for use in the early detection of colon cancer.
methodsIn this study, the expression of DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR in serum was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR expression was detected in cancer tissues by immunohistochemistry (IHC).
resultsThe level of sDC-SIGN was lower in patients than in the healthy controls, while the level of sDC-SIGNR in patients was higher than in the healthy controls. Both sDC-SIGN and sDC-SIGNR had diagnostic significances for cancer patients, and the combined diagnosis of these two markers was higher than both of them alone. Furthermore, there were significant differences between both sDC-SIGN and sDC-SIGNR in stage I/II patients and the healthy controls. Moreover, high sDC-SIGN level was accompanied with the long survival time. Additionally, DC-SIGNR was negative in the cancer foci and matched normal colon tissues but was weakly positive between the cancer foci. DC-SIGN staining was faint in matched normal colon tissues, strong in the tumor stroma and the invasive margin of colon cancer tissues, and negatively correlated with the sDC-SIGN level in serum from the same patient. Interestingly, the percent survival of patients with a DC-SIGN mean density of>0.001219 (the upper 95% confidence interval of matched normal colon tissues) was higher than for all other patients.
conclusionDC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR are blood-based molecular markers that can potentially be used for the diagnosis of early stage patients. Moreover, expression of DC-SIGN in serum and cancer tissues may affect the survival time for colon cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.