Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25504073›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Assembling programmable FRET-based photonic networks using designer DNA scaffolds.

Susan Buckhout-White, Christopher M Spillmann, W Russ Algar, Ani Khachatrian, Joseph S Melinger, Ellen R Goldman, Mario G Ancona, Igor L Medintz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A framework for multiexcitonic logic.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan Buckhout-White1] Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Code 6900, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, South West, Washington DC, Washington 20375, USA [2] College of Science, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA.
Christopher M SpillmannCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Code 6900, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, South West, Washington DC, Washington 20375, USA.
W Russ Algar1] Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Code 6900, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, South West, Washington DC, Washington 20375, USA [2] Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, 2036 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada.
Ani Khachatrian1] Electronic Science and Technology Division, Code 6800, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, South West, Washington DC, Washington 20375, USA [2] Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc., 7230 Lee DeForest Drive, Columbia, Maryland 21046, USA.
Joseph S MelingerElectronic Science and Technology Division, Code 6800, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, South West, Washington DC, Washington 20375, USA.
Ellen R GoldmanCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Code 6900, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, South West, Washington DC, Washington 20375, USA.
Mario G AnconaElectronic Science and Technology Division, Code 6800, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, South West, Washington DC, Washington 20375, USA.
Igor L MedintzCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Code 6900, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, South West, Washington DC, Washington 20375, USA.
Naval Research Laboratory Center for Bio/Molecular Science and EngineeringUnited States Naval Research Laboratory · USSotera Defense Solutions (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA demonstrates a remarkable capacity for creating designer nanostructures and devices. A growing number of these structures utilize Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) as part of the device's functionality, readout or characterization, and, as device sophistication increases so do the concomitant FRET requirements. Here we create multi-dye FRET cascades and assess how well DNA can marshal organic dyes into nanoantennae that focus excitonic energy. We evaluate 36 increasingly complex designs including linear, bifurcated, Holliday junction, 8-arm star and dendrimers involving up to five different dyes engaging in four-consecutive FRET steps, while systematically varying fluorophore spacing by Förster distance (R0). Decreasing R0 while augmenting cross-sectional collection area with multiple donors significantly increases terminal exciton delivery efficiency within dendrimers compared with the first linear constructs. Förster modelling confirms that best results are obtained when there are multiple interacting FRET pathways rather than independent channels by which excitons travel from initial donor(s) to final acceptor.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPhotonsCarbocyaninesDNAFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorescent DyesKineticsNucleic Acid ConformationThermodynamicsCarbocyaninesDNAFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID25504073
PMCPMC4275599
OpenAlexW2016585564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.