Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25504031›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2015

Multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT angiography of upper extremity arterial injury.

Jan Fritz, David T Efron, Elliot K Fishman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CT Angiography of the Upper Extremities: Review of Acute Arterial Entities.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. CTA Imaging of Peripheral Arterial Injuries.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. A Diagnostic Algorithm to Guide Operative Intervention of Zone 5 Flexor Injuries.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Roles of Trauma CT and CTA in Salvaging the Threatened or Mangled Extremity.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan FritzRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 5168, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA, jfritz9@jhmi.edu.
David T Efron
Elliot K Fishman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful management of upper extremity arterial injury requires fast and accurate diagnosis. The rate of limb preservation depends on the location, severity, and time of ischemia. Indications for diagnostic imaging depend on the mechanism and type of injury, clinical signs, cardiovascular stability, and clinical suspicion. Because of ease of access, speed, and high accuracy for this diagnosis, multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography is often used as the first line imaging modality. MDCT systems with 64 slice configuration and more afford high temporal and spatial high-resolution, isotropic data acquisition and integration with whole-body trauma MDCT protocols. The use of individual injection timing protocols ensures high diagnostic image quality. Several strategies are available to reduce radiation exposure. Direct MDCT angiography findings of arterial injuries include active extravasation, luminal narrowing, lack of luminal contrast opacification, filling defect, arteriovenous fistula, and pseudoaneurysm. Important descriptors are location and length of defect, degree of luminal narrowing, and presence of distal arterial supply reconstitution. Proximal arterial injuries include the subclavian, axillary, and brachial arteries. Distal arterial injuries include the ulnar and radial arteries, as well as the palmar arterial arches. Concomitant venous injury, musculoskeletal injury, and nerve damage are common. In this exhibit, we outline the role of MDCT angiography in the diagnosis and management of upper extremity arterial injury, discuss strategies for MDCT angiography acquisition and concepts of data visualization, and illustrate various types of injuries.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMultidetector Computed TomographyAdultAngiographyArm InjuriesArteriesContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedUpper ExtremityVascular System InjuriesContrast Media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.