Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503948›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Thermodynamic costs of information processing in sensory adaptation.

Pablo Sartori, Léo Granger, Chiu Fan Lee, Jordan M Horowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biological Systems as Physical Data Processors: Evolution as a Case of Embodied Computing.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Identification and quantification of irreversibility in stochastic systems.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stochastic thermodynamics for biological functions.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025
    Review
  7. Physical extraction of antigen and information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Information flow, gating, and energetics in dimeric molecular motors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Theoretical foundations of studying criticality in the brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Review
  13. Improved bounds on entropy production in living systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A dual-docking microfluidic cell migration assay (DIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Information processing in bacteria: memory, computation, and statistical physics: a key issues review.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pablo SartoriMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany.
Léo GrangerDepartamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear and GISC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Chiu Fan LeeDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jordan M HorowitzDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological sensory systems react to changes in their surroundings. They are characterized by fast response and slow adaptation to varying environmental cues. Insofar as sensory adaptive systems map environmental changes to changes of their internal degrees of freedom, they can be regarded as computational devices manipulating information. Landauer established that information is ultimately physical, and its manipulation subject to the entropic and energetic bounds of thermodynamics. Thus the fundamental costs of biological sensory adaptation can be elucidated by tracking how the information the system has about its environment is altered. These bounds are particularly relevant for small organisms, which unlike everyday computers, operate at very low energies. In this paper, we establish a general framework for the thermodynamics of information processing in sensing. With it, we quantify how during sensory adaptation information about the past is erased, while information about the present is gathered. This process produces entropy larger than the amount of old information erased and has an energetic cost bounded by the amount of new information written to memory. We apply these principles to the E. coli's chemotaxis pathway during binary ligand concentration changes. In this regime, we quantify the amount of information stored by each methyl group and show that receptors consume energy in the range of the information-theoretic minimum. Our work provides a basis for further inquiries into more complex phenomena, such as gradient sensing and frequency response.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalChemotaxisComputational BiologyEscherichia coliThermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID25503948
PMCPMC4263364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.