Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503806›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Exposure to endosulfan influences sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Snigdha Misra, Ajay Kumar, Ch Ratnasekhar, Vandana Sharma, Mohana Krishna Reddy Mudiam, Kristipati Ravi Ram

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Snigdha Misra1] Embryotoxicology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, M.G. Marg, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India [2] Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-IITR campus, Lucknow 226001, UP, India.
Ajay Kumar1] Embryotoxicology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, M.G. Marg, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India [2] Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-IITR campus, Lucknow 226001, UP, India.
Ch Ratnasekhar1] Analytical Chemistry, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, M.G. Marg, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India [2] Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-IITR campus, Lucknow 226001, UP, India.
Vandana Sharma1] Embryotoxicology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, M.G. Marg, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India [2] Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-IITR campus, Lucknow 226001, UP, India.
Mohana Krishna Reddy Mudiam1] Analytical Chemistry, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, M.G. Marg, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India [2] Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-IITR campus, Lucknow 226001, UP, India.
Kristipati Ravi Ram1] Embryotoxicology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, M.G. Marg, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India [2] Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-IITR campus, Lucknow 226001, UP, India.
Indian Institute of Toxicology Research · INAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dwindling male fertility due to xenobiotics is of global concern. Accordingly, male reproductive toxicity assessment of xenobiotics through semen quality analysis in exposed males, and examining progeny production of their mates is critical. These assays, in part, are biased towards monogamy. Females soliciting multiple male partners (polyandry) is the norm in many species. Polyandry incites sperm competition and allows females to bias sperm use. However, consequences of xenobiotic exposure to the sperm in the light of sperm competition remain to be understood. Therefore, we exposed Drosophila melanogaster males to endosulfan, and evaluated their progeny production as well as the ability of their sperm to counter rival control sperm in the storage organs of females sequentially mated to control/exposed males. Endosulfan (2 μg/ml) had no significant effect on progeny production and on the expression of certain genes associated with reproduction. However, exposed males performed worse in sperm competition, both as 1(st) and 2(nd) male competitors. These findings indicate that simple non-competitive measures of reproductive ability may fail to demonstrate the harmful effects of low-level exposure to xenobiotics on reproduction and advocate consideration of sperm competition, as a parameter, in the reproductive toxicity assessment of xenobiotics to mimic situations prevailing in the nature.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEndosulfanEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleInfertility, MaleMaleReproductionSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaEndosulfanEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID25503806
PMCPMC4262826
OpenAlexW1966936409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.