ArticlePloS one2014
Characterization of X chromosome inactivation using integrated analysis of whole-exome and mRNA sequencing.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential methylation as a diagnostic biomarker of rare renal diseases: a systematic review.BMC nephrology · 2019Pooled it
- Females with Fabry disease: an expert opinion on diagnosis, clinical management, current challenges and unmet needs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Transcriptome analysis provides critical answers to the "variants of uncertain significance" conundrum.Human mutation · 2022Review
- Review
- Dosage Compensation in Females with X-Linked Metabolic Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Novel familial IQSEC2 pathogenic sequence variant associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and epilepsy.Neurogenetics · 2020Article
- Skewed X-Chromosome Inactivation and Compensatory Upregulation of Escape Genes Precludes Major Clinical Symptoms in a Female With a Large Xq Deletion.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- A statistical measure for the skewness of X chromosome inactivation based on case-control design.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A statistical measure for the skewness of X chromosome inactivation based on family trios.BMC genetics · 2018Article
- A novel variant inNeuronal signaling · 2018Article
- Development of ultra-deep targeted RNA sequencing for analyzing X-chromosome inactivation in female Dent disease.Journal of human genetics · 2018Article
- Translating RNA sequencing into clinical diagnostics: opportunities and challenges.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016Review
- Circulating microbial RNA and health.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In females, X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is an epigenetic, gene dosage compensatory mechanism by inactivation of one copy of X in cells. Random XCI of one of the parental chromosomes results in an approximately equal proportion of cells expressing alleles from either the maternally or paternally inherited active X, and is defined by the XCI ratio. Skewed XCI ratio is suggestive of non-random inactivation, which can play an important role in X-linked genetic conditions. Current methods rely on indirect, semi-quantitative DNA methylation-based assay to estimate XCI ratio. Here we report a direct approach to estimate XCI ratio by integrated, family-trio based whole-exome and mRNA sequencing using phase-by-transmission of alleles coupled with allele-specific expression analysis. We applied this method to in silico data and to a clinical patient with mild cognitive impairment but no clear diagnosis or understanding molecular mechanism underlying the phenotype. Simulation showed that phased and unphased heterozygous allele expression can be used to estimate XCI ratio. Segregation analysis of the patient's exome uncovered a de novo, interstitial, 1.7 Mb deletion on Xp22.31 that originated on the paternally inherited X and previously been associated with heterogeneous, neurological phenotype. Phased, allelic expression data suggested an 83∶20 moderately skewed XCI that favored the expression of the maternally inherited, cytogenetically normal X and suggested that the deleterious affect of the de novo event on the paternal copy may be offset by skewed XCI that favors expression of the wild-type X. This study shows the utility of integrated sequencing approach in XCI ratio estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.