ArticlePloS one2014
High-throughput genome editing and phenotyping facilitated by high resolution melting curve analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 73 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid screening of genome edited strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa) regenerants using high-resolution melting analysis followed by Amplicon sequencing.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Genome editing‑based strategies to combat geminiviruses: CRISPR/Cas9 and emerging high‑fidelity tools.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Precise CRISPR-Mediated Editing of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Enhancing CRISPR Homology Directed Repair in IAL-PiD2 Insect Cells via Reagent Delivery Optimization and Cell Synchronization.Biochemical engineering journal · 2026Article
- Characterization and Phenotypic Assessment of Zebrafish Disease Models for Splice Modulation Studies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Substantial enhancement ofHorticulture research · 2025Article
- Disrupted development of sensory systems and the cerebellum in a zebrafish ebf3a mutant.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive benchmarking of genome editing quantification methods for plant applications.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Engineering precision zebrafish alleles of human disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Lack of Nuclear Localization of the Creb3l1 Transcription Factor Causes Defects in Caudal Fin Bifurcation in Zebrafish Danio rerio.Cells, tissues, organs · 2025Article
- Review
- Comparison of genotyping assays for detection of targeted CRISPR/Cas mutagenesis in highly polyploid sugarcane.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Article
- Article
- Cohesin: an emerging master regulator at the heart of cardiac development.Molecular biology of the cell · 2023Article
- Review of CRISPR/Cas Systems on Detection of Nucleotide Sequences.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Disruption of theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Variable phenotypes and penetrance between and within different zebrafish ciliary transition zone mutants.Disease models & mechanisms · 2022Article
- Reduced sister chromatid cohesion acts as a tumor penetrance modifier.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Functional Allele Validation by Gene Editing to Leverage the Wealth of Genetic Resources for Crop Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
With the goal to generate and characterize the phenotypes of null alleles in all genes within an organism and the recent advances in custom nucleases, genome editing limitations have moved from mutation generation to mutation detection. We previously demonstrated that High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis is a rapid and efficient means of genotyping known zebrafish mutants. Here we establish optimized conditions for HRM based detection of novel mutant alleles. Using these conditions, we demonstrate that HRM is highly efficient at mutation detection across multiple genome editing platforms (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPRs); we observed nuclease generated HRM positive targeting in 1 of 6 (16%) open pool derived ZFNs, 14 of 23 (60%) TALENs, and 58 of 77 (75%) CRISPR nucleases. Successful targeting, based on HRM of G0 embryos correlates well with successful germline transmission (46 of 47 nucleases); yet, surprisingly mutations in the somatic tail DNA weakly correlate with mutations in the germline F1 progeny DNA. This suggests that analysis of G0 tail DNA is a good indicator of the efficiency of the nuclease, but not necessarily a good indicator of germline alleles that will be present in the F1s. However, we demonstrate that small amplicon HRM curve profiles of F1 progeny DNA can be used to differentiate between specific mutant alleles, facilitating rare allele identification and isolation; and that HRM is a powerful technique for screening possible off-target mutations that may be generated by the nucleases. Our data suggest that micro-homology based alternative NHEJ repair is primarily utilized in the generation of CRISPR mutant alleles and allows us to predict likelihood of generating a null allele. Lastly, we demonstrate that HRM can be used to quickly distinguish genotype-phenotype correlations within F1 embryos derived from G0 intercrosses. Together these data indicate that custom nucleases, in conjunction with the ease and speed of HRM, will facilitate future high-throughput mutation generation and analysis needed to establish mutants in all genes of an organism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.