ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015
[Retroperitoneal fibrosis: development of a biomarker profile for diagnosis and therapy monitoring].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic and Epidemiological Similarities, and Differences Between Postoperative Intraperitoneal Adhesion Development and Other Benign Fibro-proliferative Disorders.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2022Review
- [New (and old) aspects of retroperitoneal fibrosis].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Review
- [Diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRetroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare chronic inflammatory disease which is characterized by fibrotic tissue in the retroperitoneal space. There have only been a few studies on serum markers of this disease. The main goal of the current investigation was to identify biological markers which are increased in the serum of patients suffering from RPF and which may correlate with the extent of fibrosis. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe serum of 42 patients with primary and yet untreated retroperitoneal fibrosis was examined for biomarkers known to be specific for fibrotic diseases and compared to a control group. In addition, patients were stratified according to the extent and volume of the retroperitoneal mass using cross-sectional imaging. To estimate the discriminatory power of the evaluated biomarkers, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created.
resultsIndependent of the extent of fibrosis, calprotectin, fibrinogen, osteopontin, matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), tenascin C and TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (TIMP-1) were significantly increased (p<0.01) in patients suffering from RPF compared to the control group. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) was significantly elevated (p<0.01) in patients with high RPF burden only but monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) showed no increase in serum levels. The discriminatory power of these parameters was ranked by the ROC analysis which demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) >0.87 for MMP-9, TIMP-1, osteopontin, tenascin C, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), fibrinogen and calprotectin and an AUC <0.64 for MMP-2, CTGF, H-FABP and MCP-1.
conclusionSeveral biomarkers of fibrogenesis were significantly elevated in patients suffering from RPF as compared to a control group. These biomarker candidates will be further evaluated for their potential to allow a differentiation between other diseases or if they could be used for disease monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.