Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503555›Full record

ReviewArchivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis2015

Transmission-Blocking Vaccines: Focus on Anti-Vector Vaccines against Tick-Borne Diseases.

Girish Neelakanta, Hameeda Sultana

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Universal Tick Vaccines: Candidates and Remaining Challenges.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  12. RNA activation in ticks.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Probing theBiomedicines · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Girish NeelakantaCenter for Molecular Medicine, Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA, gneelaka@odu.edu.
Hameeda Sultana
Old Dominion University · US

Funding

Anaplasma phagocytophilum induce Ixodes scapularis antifreeze glycoprotein gene eR03AI090197 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NEELAKANTA, GIRISH · 2011 to 2012
$162k
Human pathogenic bacterium induces actin phosphorylation to selectively regulateR03AI092156 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SULTANA, HAMEEDA · 2011 to 2012
$162k
NIAID NIH HHS AI090197NIAID NIH HHS AI092156NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI090197NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI092156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne diseases are a potential threat that account for significant morbidity and mortality in human population worldwide. Vaccines are not available to treat several of the tick-borne diseases. With the emergence and resurgence of several tick-borne diseases, emphasis on the development of transmission-blocking vaccines remains increasing. In this review, we provide a snap shot on some of the potential candidates for the development of anti-vector vaccines (a form of transmission-blocking vaccines) against wide range of hard and soft ticks that include Ixodes, Haemaphysalis, Dermacentor, Amblyomma, Rhipicephalus and Ornithodoros species.

Indexed as

TicksVaccinesAnimalsGenetic VectorsHumansTick-Borne DiseasesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID25503555
PMCPMC4429137
OpenAlexW1996549820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.