Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503552›Full record

ReviewStroke2015

One, two, three steps toward cell therapy for stroke.

Theo Diamandis, Cesar V Borlongan

Abstract readEditorialReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. An update on stem cell therapy for stroke patients: Where are we now?Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Optimizing functional outcome endpoints for stroke recovery studies.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Impact of Bone Fracture on Ischemic Stroke Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Theo DiamandisFrom the Department of Neurosugery and Brain Repair, Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Cesar V BorlonganFrom the Department of Neurosugery and Brain Repair, Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa. cborlong@health.usf.edu.

Funding

Blood-Brain Barrier Repair in Cell Therapy for StrokeR01NS071956 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORLONGAN, CESARIO V, GARBUZOVA-DAVIS, SVITLANA NICOLAI · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
Vascular repair extends therapeutic window for ischemic strokeR21NS089851 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORLONGAN, CESARIO V · 2014 to 2015
$411k
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS071956-01NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071956NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS089851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicStem Cell TransplantationStrokestandardsstem cellsstroketherapy

Identifiers

PMID25503552
PMCPMC4354885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.