Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503440›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Centuries of domestication has not impaired oviposition site-selection function in the silkmoth, Bombyx mori.

Kamala Jayanthi Pagadala Damodaram, Vivek Kempraj, Ravindra Mahadappa Aurade, Sowmya Bandhisara Rajasekhar, Ravindra Kothapalli Venkataramanappa, Bakthavatsalam Nandagopal, Abraham Verghese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insects · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Decoding chemical interactions among pomegranate,Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamala Jayanthi Pagadala DamodaramNational Fellow Lab, Division of Entomology and Nematology, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesserghatta Lake Post, Bangalore 560 089, India.
Vivek KemprajNational Fellow Lab, Division of Entomology and Nematology, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesserghatta Lake Post, Bangalore 560 089, India.
Ravindra Mahadappa AuradeNational Fellow Lab, Division of Entomology and Nematology, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesserghatta Lake Post, Bangalore 560 089, India.
Sowmya Bandhisara RajasekharNational Fellow Lab, Division of Entomology and Nematology, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesserghatta Lake Post, Bangalore 560 089, India.
Ravindra Kothapalli VenkataramanappaDepartment of Insect Ecology, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, Bangalore, 560 024, India.
Bakthavatsalam NandagopalDepartment of Insect Ecology, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, Bangalore, 560 024, India.
Abraham VergheseDepartment of Insect Ecology, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, Bangalore, 560 024, India.
National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oviposition site-selection in insects is mediated through innate recognition templates (IRTs) tuned to specific chemical cues. These cues aid gravid insects in choosing suitable oviposition sites and may even enhance the fitness of their offspring by warding off predators and parasitoids. However, studies on the evolution of oviposition site-selection and cues instigating oviposition in domesticated insects remain elusive. Using the interaction between the silkmoth, Bombyx mori, and its host plant mulberry, Morus alba, as a model system, we demonstrate that centuries of domestication of silkmoth has not impaired its oviposition site-selection function. Silkmoths significantly preferred mulberry leaves to filter paper as oviposition sites. Oviposition assays with filter paper, filter paper treated with leaf volatiles and leaf alone proved that surface texture was not a significant criterion for oviposition site-selection, but volatile cues were. Oviposition assays with electrophysiologically active compounds from mulberry revealed that two of the volatiles, valencene and α-humulene, aided moths in choosing suitable oviposition sites and enhanced egg-laying significantly. Moreover, we show that generalist egg-parasitoids are strongly repelled by valencene and α-humulene. Our results demonstrate that IRTs tuned to cues that aid crucial functions like oviposition site-selection are less likely to be impaired even after centuries of domestication.

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsAnimals, DomesticBehavior, AnimalBombyxChemotactic FactorsChemotaxisEggsLarvaModels, BiologicalMonocyclic SesquiterpenesMorusOvipositionPest Control, BiologicalPlant LeavesSesquiterpenesChemotactic FactorshumuleneMonocyclic SesquiterpenesSesquiterpenesvalencene

Identifiers

PMID25503440
PMCPMC4265781
OpenAlexW2067994811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.