Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503382›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2015

Biopolymer implants enhance the efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapy.

Sirkka B Stephan, Alexandria M Taber, Ilona Jileaeva, Ericka P Pegues, Charles L Sentman, Matthias T Stephan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 211 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
211citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

211 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Chemokine/cytokine-releasing biomaterials induce in situ tertiary lymphoid-like structures and enhance antitumor immunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

151 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sirkka B StephanClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alexandria M TaberClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ilona JileaevaTechnology Access Foundation (TAF) Academy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ericka P PeguesTechnology Access Foundation (TAF) Academy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Charles L SentmanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Matthias T Stephan1] Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA. [2] Technology Access Foundation (TAF) Academy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA. [3] Department of Bioengineering and Molecular Engineering &Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. [4] Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
Targeted immunotherapy of breast cancer with central memory T cellsP50CA138293 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PORTER, PEGGY L. · 2010 to 2014
$11.0M
Preventing tumor relapse with biomaterial-supported lymphocyte implantsR01CA181413 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI STEPHAN, MATTHIAS · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636NCI NIH HHS P50 CA138293NCI NIH HHS P50 CA83636NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although adoptive T-cell therapy holds promise for the treatment of many cancers, its clinical utility has been limited by problems in delivering targeted lymphocytes to tumor sites, and the cells' inefficient expansion in the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Here we describe a bioactive polymer implant capable of delivering, expanding and dispersing tumor-reactive T cells. The approach can be used to treat inoperable or incompletely removed tumors by situating implants near them or at resection sites. Using a mouse breast cancer resection model, we show that the implants effectively support tumor-targeting T cells throughout resection beds and associated lymph nodes, and reduce tumor relapse compared to conventional delivery modalities. In a multifocal ovarian cancer model, we demonstrate that polymer-delivered T cells trigger regression, whereas injected tumor-reactive lymphocytes have little curative effect. Scaffold-based T-cell delivery may provide a viable treatment option for inoperable tumors and reduce the rate of metastatic relapse after surgery.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferBiopolymersProstheses and ImplantsT-LymphocytesBiopolymers

Identifiers

PMID25503382
PMCPMC4289408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.