Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503310›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2015

[Plasma cell myeloma in the stomach?].

T Katzenberger, O Al-Taie, W Fischbach, M Eck

Abstract readCase ReportsEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T KatzenbergerInstitut für Pathologie, Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Am Hasenkopf, 63739, Aschaffenburg, Deutschland, tiemo.katzenberger@klinikum-aschaffenburg.de.
O Al-Taie
W Fischbach
M Eck
Klinikum Aschaffenburg · DESt. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of a diffuse infiltrate of heterogeneous small B-cells in the lamina propria mucosae invading the epithelium and destroying the glandular tissue by discrete aggregates of three or more marginal zone B-cells above the basal membrane (so-called lymphoepithelial lesions) is suspicious of a mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the stomach. The demonstration of a monoclonal B-cell population by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization or PCR excludes a benign lymphatic lesion. In the differential diagnosis with other small B-cell lymphomas in the stomach, a panel of five different immunohistochemical markers is useful to diagnose a small lymphocytic lymphoma (CD5 and CD23 positive), a mantle cell lymphoma (CD5 and cyclin D1 positive) or a follicular lymphoma (BCL2 and CD10 positive). The presence of the translocation t(11;18)(q21;q21) or the API2/MALT1 rearrangement could give further information about the clinical course and the prognosis of a gastric MALT lymphoma.

Indexed as

AgedB-LymphocytesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGastric MucosaHumansIn Situ HybridizationLymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZoneMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiple MyelomaPrognosisStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25503310
OpenAlexW115969404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.