Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503085›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Multiple lineages of ancient CR1 retroposons shaped the early genome evolution of amniotes.

Alexander Suh, Gennady Churakov, Meganathan P Ramakodi, Roy N Platt, Jerzy Jurka, Kenji K Kojima, Juan Caballero, Arian F Smit, Kent A Vliet, Federico G Hoffmann and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Transposable Elements and Stress in Vertebrates: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. The whale shark genome reveals how genomic and physiological properties scale with body size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alexander SuhInstitute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, Germany Department of Evolutionary Biology (EBC), Uppsala University, Sweden alexander.suh@ebc.uu.se.
Gennady ChurakovInstitute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, Germany.
Meganathan P RamakodiDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University Present address: Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA Present address: Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Roy N PlattDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University.
Jerzy JurkaGenetic Information Research Institute, Mountain View, California.
Kenji K KojimaGenetic Information Research Institute, Mountain View, California.
Juan CaballeroInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
Arian F SmitInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
Kent A VlietDepartment of Biology, University of Florida.
Federico G HoffmannDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University.
Jürgen BrosiusInstitute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, Germany.
Richard E GreenDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California.
Edward L BraunDepartment of Biology and Genetics Institute, University of Florida.
David A RayDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University.
Jürgen SchmitzInstitute of Experimental Pathology (ZMBE), University of Münster, Germany.

Funding

Maintenance and Development of RepeatMasker and RepeatModelerR01HG002939 · NHGRI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI Robert MacDonald Hubley, Arian Fredericus Anthonius Smit · 2003 to 2026
$9.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chicken repeat 1 (CR1) retroposons are long interspersed elements (LINEs) that are ubiquitous within amniote genomes and constitute the most abundant family of transposed elements in birds, crocodilians, turtles, and snakes. They are also present in mammalian genomes, where they reside as numerous relics of ancient retroposition events. Yet, despite their relevance for understanding amniote genome evolution, the diversity and evolution of CR1 elements has never been studied on an amniote-wide level. We reconstruct the temporal and quantitative activity of CR1 subfamilies via presence/absence analyses across crocodilian phylogeny and comparative analyses of 12 crocodilian genomes, revealing relative genomic stasis of retroposition during genome evolution of extant Crocodylia. Our large-scale phylogenetic analysis of amniote CR1 subfamilies suggests the presence of at least seven ancient CR1 lineages in the amniote ancestor; and amniote-wide analyses of CR1 successions and quantities reveal differential retention (presence of ancient relics or recent activity) of these CR1 lineages across amniote genome evolution. Interestingly, birds and lepidosaurs retained the fewest ancient CR1 lineages among amniotes and also exhibit smaller genome sizes. Our study is the first to analyze CR1 evolution in a genome-wide and amniote-wide context and the data strongly suggest that the ancestral amniote genome contained myriad CR1 elements from multiple ancient lineages, and remnants of these are still detectable in the relatively stable genomes of crocodilians and turtles. Early mammalian genome evolution was thus characterized by a drastic shift from CR1 prevalence to dominance and hyperactivity of L2 LINEs in monotremes and L1 LINEs in therians.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAlligators and CrocodilesAnimalsGenomeLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsRetroelementsTurtlesRetroelementsamnioteschicken repeat 1comparative genomicscrocodilian genomesphylogenomicstransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID25503085
PMCPMC4316615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.