Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25503082›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2015

A pooled analysis evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of tapentadol extended release for chronic, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Sherwyn Schwartz, Mila S Etropolski, Douglas Y Shapiro, Christine Rauschkolb, Aaron I Vinik, Bernd Lange, Kimberly Cooper, Ilse Van Hove, Juergen Haeussler

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00455520 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized-Withdrawal Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of CG5503 Extended Release (ER) in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.Ran2007 to 2008Enrolled395ConditionsDiabetic NeuropathyArmsCG5503, placebo
NCT01041859 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized-Withdrawal, Placebo-Controlled, Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tapentadol Extended-Release (ER) in Subjects With Chronic, Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.Ran2009 to 2011Enrolled460ConditionsDiabetic Peripheral NeuropathyArmsTapentadol extended release (ER), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Challenges of neuropathic pain: focus on diabetic neuropathy.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Spinal αBritish journal of pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Diagnosing and managing diabetic somatic and autonomic neuropathy.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The switch from buprenorphine to tapentadol: is it worth?Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sherwyn SchwartzCetero Research, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Mila S Etropolski
Douglas Y Shapiro
Christine Rauschkolb
Aaron I Vinik
Bernd Lange
Kimberly Cooper
Ilse Van Hove
Juergen Haeussler
Janssen (Belgium) · BEDiabetes Research CenterGrünenthal Group (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveData from two similarly designed studies of tapentadol extended release (ER) for managing neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN; NCT00455520, NCT01041859) in adults were pooled for this analysis, allowing a detailed evaluation of efficacy in patient subgroups and secondary endpoints.

methodsIn each study, patients were titrated to their optimal dose of open-label tapentadol ER [100-250 mg twice daily (bid)] over 3 weeks. Patients with ≥1-point improvement in average pain intensity [11-point numerical rating scale (NRS)] were randomized (1:1) to receive placebo or tapentadol ER during a 12-week, double-blind maintenance period.

resultsMean (standard deviation [SD]) changes in pain intensity from baseline to week 12 of maintenance in the placebo (n = 343) and tapentadol ER (n = 360) groups, respectively, were 1.28 (2.41) and 0.08 (1.87) [least squares mean difference (LSMD): -1.14 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: -1.435, -0.838); P < 0.001, in favour of tapentadol ER]. Significant between-group differences were also observed in changes from the start of the double-blind treatment period to the double-blind endpoint for the Short Form-36 physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, social functioning and role-emotional subscale and physical component summary scores, and the EuroQol 5-Dimension health status index (all P < 0.05, in favour of tapentadol ER). No clinically relevant differences were observed in the efficacy of tapentadol ER across patient subgroups divided by age, sex, race, opioid experience and pain intensity. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were 56.0 % (192/343) with placebo and 74.7 % (269/360) with tapentadol ER during maintenance.

conclusionResults of this pooled analysis indicate that tapentadol ER was effective for managing DPN-related pain, and provided consistent analgesic efficacy across different patient subgroups.

Indexed as

AgedAnalgesicsChronic DiseaseDelayed-Action PreparationsDiabetic NephropathiesDrug ToleranceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenolsReceptors, Opioid, muTapentadolAnalgesicsDelayed-Action PreparationsPhenolsReceptors, Opioid, muTapentadol

Identifiers

PMID25503082
PMCPMC4300409
OpenAlexW2025460519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.