ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2015
WRN protein as a novel erythroblast immunohistochemical marker with applications for the diagnosis of Werner syndrome.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Successful Cord Blood Transplantation in a Werner Syndrome Patient with High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic testing for mutations in the WRN gene is critical for the diagnosis of Werner syndrome (WS); however, these tests cannot be performed in a clinical setting. Nearly all of the WRN mutations result in expression of truncated WRN proteins that are missing the C-terminal nuclear localization signal. We evaluated the use of WRN protein immunohistochemistry for diagnosing WS using paraffin-embedded bone marrow sections. Using a well-defined commercially available polyclonal antibody against the C terminus of WRN, we found that of all the cell types tested, bone marrow erythroid precursors showed the strongest nuclear expression of WRN. Immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow samples from 120 patients with non-WS hematological disorders (age range, 7 days-90 years) revealed WRN staining of the nuclei of CD71-positive early and late erythroid precursors. Erythroblasts negative for WRN immunostaining were only observed in two patients, both of whom were diagnosed with WS: one with concomitant myelodysplastic syndrome and the other with erythroleukemia with overexpression of TP53. Western blot analysis and immunocytochemistry indicated WRN was localized in the nuclei of the four positive control cell lines from non-WS patients but not in the five cell lines from WS patients, who had three different types of WRN mutations. Thus, immunohistochemical detection of WRN in erythroblasts from bone marrow paraffin sections could be useful in screening of WS cases and worthy of further molecular confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.